1990
DOI: 10.1097/00007435-199007000-00006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chlamydia trachomatis Infection In Women Attending Urban Midwestern Family Planning and Community Health Clinics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
17
0
3

Year Published

1991
1991
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
17
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Use of a barrier method was shown to be associated with reduced risk of infection compared with the use of other methods of contraception in two of five studies in females (33,54,70,71,87). Compared with no contraceptives, use of a barrier method was protective against chlamydia for females in three of five studies (32,69,81,88,89).…”
Section: Risk Factors For Genital Chlamydial Infectionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Use of a barrier method was shown to be associated with reduced risk of infection compared with the use of other methods of contraception in two of five studies in females (33,54,70,71,87). Compared with no contraceptives, use of a barrier method was protective against chlamydia for females in three of five studies (32,69,81,88,89).…”
Section: Risk Factors For Genital Chlamydial Infectionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Current pregnancy was associated with a 1.4-to 1.8-fold risk of being infected in three studies (50,88,89); not only does it indicate inconsistent or nonuse of contraceptives, this relationship has also been attributed to increased hormonal levels and lower immunity during pregnancy (77). However, the results for a history of pregnancy were mixed -two studies found that nulliparity was protective against infection (35,51), and two found it to be associated with an increased risk of the infection (55,77), while Addiss et al (87) found that women with one child or no children were at five times greater risk for chlamydia than women with two or more children. This may be due to involuntary infertility following 'silent' chlamydial PID.…”
Section: Other Risk Factorsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…5,6,[17][18][19] Two of the 5 combined data from primary care sites with specialty sites such as family planning and obstetrics/gynecology clinics, 18,19 and only 3 of the studies collected data on women under 18 years old. 5,6,19 Of those 3, only 1 provided prevalence figures for age strata under 25 years (13% in 15-19 year olds and 6% in 20 -24-yearolds), 6 and used highly selective enrollment criteria for participants under 18 years old. One study reported a GC infection prevalence of 2.3% in 15-to by guest on May 9, 2018 http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/ Downloaded from 44-year-old patients of private physicians' offices and 3% in patients aged 15 to 19 years old from a combination of primary care and specialty sites.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nos Estados Unidos, uma variedade de estudos realizados têm demonstrado que as infecções por clamídia e gonococo têm alta prevalência entre as usuárias de planejamento familiar, variando de 4,5% a 12,4% para a clamídia 1,2 e 0,5% para a gonorréia 1 . Devido ao fato de a infecção por clamídia quando não tratada poder apresentar graves conseqüências, como a doença inflamatória pélvica, infertilidade e transmissão neonatal 3 , as normas padrões dos serviços de planejamento familiar nos Estados Unidos foram expandidas para incluir o exame de rotina para essas doenças.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified