2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chitosan-MnO2 nanocomposite for effective removal of Cr (VI) from aqueous solution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In other pure adsorbents, it was also observed that these adsorbents were not very effective in the immobilization of Cr in soil, but the preparation of chitosan composites with more efficient properties increased the efficiency of the pure adsorbents for the Cr immobilization in the soil. These results are consistent with the findings of Ngah et al (2012), Burk et al (2020), andDinh et al (2020).…”
Section: Adsorption Mechanisms Of Cr 6+ On Different Adsorbentssupporting
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In other pure adsorbents, it was also observed that these adsorbents were not very effective in the immobilization of Cr in soil, but the preparation of chitosan composites with more efficient properties increased the efficiency of the pure adsorbents for the Cr immobilization in the soil. These results are consistent with the findings of Ngah et al (2012), Burk et al (2020), andDinh et al (2020).…”
Section: Adsorption Mechanisms Of Cr 6+ On Different Adsorbentssupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Therefore, chitosan-coated gasified biochar removed more Cd 2+ (17.2 mg/g) and Cu 2+ (25.8 mg/g) than the uncoated gasified biochar. Dinh et al (2020) investigated the adsorption of Cr 6+ onto manganese dioxide-chitosan nanocomposite material from aqueous solutions. The results obtained show that calculated Langmuir monolayer adsorption capacity was 61.56 mg/g at pH of 2.0 and adsorption time of 120 min.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When pH = 3, the r e value of Cr(VI) reached 97.69%. It is higher than those of α–Fe 2 O 3 /GO nanocomposite (86.31%) [ 40 ], magnetic greigite/biochar (MGBs) composites (93.00%) [ 72 ], MnO 2 /CS nanocomposite (94.21%) [ 73 ] and polyamine modified carbon nanotube (PA–CNT) adsorbents (95.00%) [ 74 ]. These results indicated that the adsorbent did not cause secondary pollution to the environment, and at the same time retained good stability and a high removal rate in a strongly acidic solution.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the fourth time adsorption–desorption cycle, there is a marked decline for the Cr (VI) adsorption from 118.5 ± 0.3 mg/g to 93.4 ± 0.1 mg/g, which may be due to PDA consumption from PES/PDA ultrafine fibers or the parts of functional groups were inactivation. It shows that the PES/PDA ultrafine fibers have higher reusability (decrease by 1.8% for 3 cycles) than the other adsorbent materials, α‐Fe 2 O 3 @C nanocomposites 54 (decrease by 4.2% for 3 cycles), succinate/Alg porous gel beads 55 (decrease by 4.9% for 3 cycles), and MnO 2 /CS adsorbent (decrease by14.1% for 5 cycles) 56 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%