2000
DOI: 10.21273/jashs.125.6.742
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chitosan Effects on Blackmold Rot and Pathogenic Factors Produced by Alternaria alternata in Postharvest Tomatoes

Abstract: Stem scar application of chitosan inhibited growth and production of pathogenic factors by blackmold rot [Alternaria alternata (Fr.:Fr.) Keissl.] in challenged tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) fruit stored at 20 °C for 28 days. Blackmold lesions were visible within 4 days of inoculation in control fruit, compared with >7 days in chitosantreated fruit. Macerating enzyme activity (polygalacturonase, pectate lyase, and cellulase) in the tissue… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
18
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
4
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pathosystem Alternaria ‐tomato is well documented and we observed the classical blackmold lesions in inoculated tomatoes, indicating the active infection of the fruit 4 days after inoculation. This finding agrees with previous experiments in our lab in which tomato fruits were infected with the same strain of A. alternata (Troncoso et al., 2005; Troncoso‐Rojas et al., 2005) and with other experiments in which harvested tomatoes were inoculated with A. alternata (Reddy et al., 2000).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The pathosystem Alternaria ‐tomato is well documented and we observed the classical blackmold lesions in inoculated tomatoes, indicating the active infection of the fruit 4 days after inoculation. This finding agrees with previous experiments in our lab in which tomato fruits were infected with the same strain of A. alternata (Troncoso et al., 2005; Troncoso‐Rojas et al., 2005) and with other experiments in which harvested tomatoes were inoculated with A. alternata (Reddy et al., 2000).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…1). These results were similar to previous findings on the antifungal activity of chitosan against several other fungal pathogens, such as Aspergillus parasiticus (Cota-Arriola et al 2011), Geotricum candidum (El-Mougy et al 2012), Alternaria alternata (Reddy et al, 2000), Fusarium solani and Sclerotium rolfsii (Eweis et al 2006). Several complex mechanisms were proposed in these previous studies to explain the antifungal activity of chitosan.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In previous studies, it was shown that application of chitosan affects growth, morphology, and toxin production by A. alternata f. sp. Similarly, Reddy et al (2000) reported that stem scar application of chitosan inhibited the development of A. alternata on tomatoes stored at 20°C for 28 days by 34%, and reduces production of pathogenic factors by the fungus, such as cell wall-degrading enzymes (polygalacturonase, pectate lyase, and cellulose), organic acids, and host-specific toxins responsible for fungal penetration and host tissue damage. Similarly, Reddy et al (2000) reported that stem scar application of chitosan inhibited the development of A. alternata on tomatoes stored at 20°C for 28 days by 34%, and reduces production of pathogenic factors by the fungus, such as cell wall-degrading enzymes (polygalacturonase, pectate lyase, and cellulose), organic acids, and host-specific toxins responsible for fungal penetration and host tissue damage.…”
Section: Chitosanmentioning
confidence: 93%