2013
DOI: 10.1089/ped.2013.0285
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chiral Switch Drugs for Asthma and Allergies: True Benefit or Marketing Hype

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, regulatory agencies' interest in evaluating each enantiomer in a racemate spurred development of single enantiomers, which now account for 55% of the new molecular entities approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (Agranat et al, 2012). Although the decision to develop a single-enantiomer product should include both scientific and economic rationales (Blake and Raissy, 2013), poor understanding of the kinetics of each individual enantiomer, especially the interplay between enantiomer racemization and difference in enantiomer elimination, can still lead to redundant investment in developing an enantiomer over the racemate. Levalbuterol, the R-enantiomer of albuterol, was introduced in the US market in 1999 based on the fact that the R-enantiomer is stereoselective at the target receptor with a 68-fold greater potency than the S-enantiomer (Brittain et al, 1973).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However, regulatory agencies' interest in evaluating each enantiomer in a racemate spurred development of single enantiomers, which now account for 55% of the new molecular entities approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (Agranat et al, 2012). Although the decision to develop a single-enantiomer product should include both scientific and economic rationales (Blake and Raissy, 2013), poor understanding of the kinetics of each individual enantiomer, especially the interplay between enantiomer racemization and difference in enantiomer elimination, can still lead to redundant investment in developing an enantiomer over the racemate. Levalbuterol, the R-enantiomer of albuterol, was introduced in the US market in 1999 based on the fact that the R-enantiomer is stereoselective at the target receptor with a 68-fold greater potency than the S-enantiomer (Brittain et al, 1973).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a randomized crossover study in which the racemate and the R-and S-enantiomers were administered demonstrated that the therapeutic ratio of the Renantiomer was comparable with that of the racemate in asthma patients (Lotvall et al, 2001), which might be due to the limited understanding of the interplay between enantiomer racemization and enantiomer elimination in vivo. Similarly, arformoterol, the (R,R)-enantiomer of formoterol, having a 1000-fold greater potency than the (S,S)-enantiomer, was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2006 (Blake and Raissy, 2013). Available data indicate that there is no evidence to suggest an advantage of the (R,R)-enantiomer, which might be due to the different kinetic profiles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For better clinical performance of the molecule, it has become necessity to study the chirality of the molecule. In most of the cases, it can be studied by optical rotatory dispersion and circular dichroism [8].…”
Section: Chiralitymentioning
confidence: 99%