2013
DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2013.102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chiral spin torque at magnetic domain walls

Abstract: Spin-polarized currents provide a powerful means of manipulating the magnetization of nanodevices, and give rise to spin transfer torques that can drive magnetic domain walls along nanowires. In ultrathin magnetic wires, domain walls are found to move in the opposite direction to that expected from bulk spin transfer torques, and also at much higher speeds. Here we show that this is due to two intertwined phenomena, both derived from spin-orbit interactions. By measuring the influence of magnetic fields on cur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

47
1,047
7

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,136 publications
(1,133 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
47
1,047
7
Order By: Relevance
“…motion [8][9][10] in recent experiments. Typical heterostructures exhibiting SOTs consist of a ferromagnet (F) with a heavy nonmagnetic metal (NM) having strong spin-orbit coupling on one side, and an insulator (I) on the other side (referred to as NM/F/I structures, shown schematically in Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…motion [8][9][10] in recent experiments. Typical heterostructures exhibiting SOTs consist of a ferromagnet (F) with a heavy nonmagnetic metal (NM) having strong spin-orbit coupling on one side, and an insulator (I) on the other side (referred to as NM/F/I structures, shown schematically in Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The structural asymmetry in various magnetic heterostructures has been engineered to reveal novel fundamental interactions between electric currents and magnetization, resulting in spin-orbit-torques (SOTs) on the magnetization [1][2][3][4][5][6] , which are both fundamentally important and technologically promising for device applications. Such SOTs have been used to realize current-induced magnetization switching [2][3][4]7 and domain-wall 3 motion [8][9][10] in recent experiments. Typical heterostructures exhibiting SOTs consist of a ferromagnet (F) with a heavy nonmagnetic metal (NM) having strong spin-orbit coupling on one side, and an insulator (I) on the other side (referred to as NM/F/I structures, shown schematically in Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a delay is a major issue for STT devices, since thermal fluctuations result in a switching time distribution that is several ns wide 22,23 . Furthermore, the SOT-induced magnetization dynamics is governed by strong damping in the monodomain regime 24,25 and fast domain wall motion in the multidomain regime [16][17][18] , both favoring rapid reversal of the magnetization.…”
Section: Arxiv:170406402v1 [Cond-matmtrl-sci] 21 Apr 2017mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these experiments only measured the switching probability as a function of pulse amplitude and duration, while the mechanism and the timescale of magnetization reversal remain unknown. Microscopy studies performed using the magneto-optic Kerr effect have extensively probed SOT-induced DW displacements [14][15][16][17][18][19]28 , revealing the role played by the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction (DMI) in stabilizing chiral DW structures that have very high mobility 17,18,[29][30][31][32][33] . Such investigations have a spatial resolution of the order of 1 µm, but only probed the static magnetization after current injection, similar to the pulsed switching experiments 1,26,27 .…”
Section: Arxiv:170406402v1 [Cond-matmtrl-sci] 21 Apr 2017mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation