1992
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.46.4574
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chiral Schwinger model based on the Batalin-Fradkin-Vilkovisky formalism

Abstract: We quantize the bosonized chiral Schwinger model by using the systematic Batalin-FradkinVilkovisky formalism. We derive a Becchi-Rouet-Stora-Tyutin gauge-fixed covariant action showing that the auxiliary fields introduced in the formalism turn into the Wess-Zumino scalar.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
40
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have applied the FIK method to the bosonized chiral Schwinger model (CSM) [4]. Recently, Banerjee, Rothe, and Rothe [5] have pointed out that the FIK analyses [3,4] are not a systematic application of the BFV formalism. After their work, Banerjee [6] has systematically applied Batalin-Tyutin (BT) Hamiltonian method [7] to the second class constraint system of the abelian Chern-Simons (CS) field theory [8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have applied the FIK method to the bosonized chiral Schwinger model (CSM) [4]. Recently, Banerjee, Rothe, and Rothe [5] have pointed out that the FIK analyses [3,4] are not a systematic application of the BFV formalism. After their work, Banerjee [6] has systematically applied Batalin-Tyutin (BT) Hamiltonian method [7] to the second class constraint system of the abelian Chern-Simons (CS) field theory [8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the Becci-Rouet-StoraTyutin (BRST) [2,3] quantization of constrained systems along the lines originally established by Batalin, Fradkin, and Vilkovisky [4,5], and then reformulated in a more tractable and elegant version by Batalin, Fradkin, and Tytin [6], does not suffer from these difficulties, as it relies on a simple Poisson bracket structure. As a result, the embedding of secondclass systems into first-class ones (gauge theories) has received much attention in the past years and the DQM improved in this way, has been applied to a number of models [7][8][9][10][11][12][13] in order to obtain the corresponding Wess-Zumino (WZ) actions [14,15]. In fact, the earlier work on this subject is based on the traditional Dirac's pioneering work [1], which has been criticized for introducing "superfluous" primary constraints, and has been avoided in more recent treatments, based on the symplectic structure of phase space.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It means that the Hamiltonian system described by the GUP brackets can be interpreted as a gauge fixed version of the first class constraint system. The similar behaviors can be found in the chiral Schwinger model [19][20][21] and the Chern-Simons theory [22][23][24].…”
mentioning
confidence: 50%