2022
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.128.225701
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chiral Ising Gross-Neveu Criticality of a Single Dirac Cone: A Quantum Monte Carlo Study

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
3
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For N = 8, the large-N estimates are also close to the island that we find. Monte Carlo estimates for some of the scaling dimensions are also available for N = 2, 4, 8 [37,39,43]; these results, while close to our islands, have error bars that, in most cases, are disallowed by the rigorous bounds obtained from the bootstrap (see section 4). In all cases, our work presents a significant jump in the precision of scaling dimension determinations.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…For N = 8, the large-N estimates are also close to the island that we find. Monte Carlo estimates for some of the scaling dimensions are also available for N = 2, 4, 8 [37,39,43]; these results, while close to our islands, have error bars that, in most cases, are disallowed by the rigorous bounds obtained from the bootstrap (see section 4). In all cases, our work presents a significant jump in the precision of scaling dimension determinations.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…regions 23 after projections to the (∆ σ , ∆ ) and (∆ ψ , ∆ σ ) planes. As shown in the (∆ σ , ∆ )plane, the bootstrap results exclude the reported error bars from earlier Monte Carlo studies from [37]; as can be seen in both plots, the bootstrap results also marginally exclude the reported error bars from the -expansion results after Borel resummation [31]. For both studies, the bootstrap results improve the precision of some of these estimates by orders of magnitude.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 53%
See 3 more Smart Citations