1993
DOI: 10.1016/0370-2693(93)90956-i
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chiral corrections to the S-wave pion-nucleon scattering lengths

Abstract: We calculate the chiral corrections to Weinberg's prediction for the S-wave πN scattering lengths up-to-and-including order O(M 3 π ) making use of heavy baryon chiral perturbation theory. For the isospin-odd scattering length a − these corrections are small and bring the prediction closer to the empirical value. In the case of the isospineven a + large cancellations appear so that the O(M 3 π ) result depends sensitively on certain resonance parameters which enter the calculation of the contact terms present … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
66
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
6
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This manifests in the large size of the LECs c 3 and c 4 in Table 1 due to the ∆(1232) contribution to them, evaluated in Refs. [62,63]. The large impact of the ∆(1232) is the well-known reason for the large size of subleading TPE, but once its leading effects are taken into account at O(p 3 ) the chiral expansion stabilizes [31,48], as we have also concluded in the discussion following Eq.…”
Section: S 0 Wavesupporting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This manifests in the large size of the LECs c 3 and c 4 in Table 1 due to the ∆(1232) contribution to them, evaluated in Refs. [62,63]. The large impact of the ∆(1232) is the well-known reason for the large size of subleading TPE, but once its leading effects are taken into account at O(p 3 ) the chiral expansion stabilizes [31,48], as we have also concluded in the discussion following Eq.…”
Section: S 0 Wavesupporting
confidence: 55%
“…The present NNLO calculation from Eqs. (62) and (65) reproduces the Nijmegen PWA mixing angle ǫ 1 much better than the NLO result from the same set of equations, which is shown by the (magenta) dot-dashed lines. This improvement in the description of ǫ 1 when passing from NLO to NNLO is also seen in Ref.…”
Section: Coupledmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…But compared with the result of the previous approach [35], the change is sizable, even in isospin-symmetric matter. This is again due to the explicit density dependence of the moment of inertia (37), and the changes in the solutions of the classical equations (43). Note that with increasing density the moment of inertia Λ * decreases since χ 02 s < 0.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[35]. In addition to the strong isospin-breaking in the mesonic sector it explicitly takes into account the different influences of the isospin-asymmetric environment on the charged (π ± ) and neutral (π 0 ) pion fields via a builtin energy dependence in the s-wave pion-nucleon (π ± N) scattering lengths [37,38,39,40,41] and the p-wave optical potential [42]. This additional energy dependence also alters the predictions for iso-symmetric matter considerably.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Higher-order corrections to a + and a − involve low-energy constants (LECs) [3]. Unfortunately, the lack of information about the LECs and large cancellations between individual contributions strongly restrict the predictive power of the chiral expansion for a + .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%