2008
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-7643-8786-0_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chip-Firing and Rotor-Routing on Directed Graphs

Abstract: Abstract. We give a rigorous and self-contained survey of the abelian sandpile model and rotor-router model on finite directed graphs, highlighting the connections between them. We present several intriguing open problems.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
298
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(303 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
4
298
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(15) is an integer, and as a consequence of Corollary 5.5, in all relevant cases the exponent of the highest power of p ∈ P dividing this integer is at most t, so that an integer µ p,t for which (15) holds indeed can be found. Next, Theorem 2.5 states thatẽ p t Mp − λ p,t e Mp is in S(m, d) if and only if p t M p − λ p,t M p ≡ 0 mod m, or, equivalently, if p t ≡ λ p,t mod m, which holds since it is just the second requirement in (15). By the same theorem, obviouslyẽ Mp = π p (m)e Mp is also in S(m, d), and the same holds forẽ M 2 andẽ m/2 as defined in (16 (15).…”
Section: Adaptations For the Case Of Generalized Kautz Graphsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…(15) is an integer, and as a consequence of Corollary 5.5, in all relevant cases the exponent of the highest power of p ∈ P dividing this integer is at most t, so that an integer µ p,t for which (15) holds indeed can be found. Next, Theorem 2.5 states thatẽ p t Mp − λ p,t e Mp is in S(m, d) if and only if p t M p − λ p,t M p ≡ 0 mod m, or, equivalently, if p t ≡ λ p,t mod m, which holds since it is just the second requirement in (15). By the same theorem, obviouslyẽ Mp = π p (m)e Mp is also in S(m, d), and the same holds forẽ M 2 andẽ m/2 as defined in (16 (15).…”
Section: Adaptations For the Case Of Generalized Kautz Graphsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In that case, S(G, v) does not depend on the vertex v and is equal to the critical group S(G) of G, essentially because in that case, not only the columns, but also the rows of the Laplacian ∆ of G sum to zero; for a detailed proof, see [15] (note that the proof as given there does not use the assumption that the directed graph is connected). For more details on sandpile groups and the critical group of a directed graph, we refer for example to [15] or [33].…”
Section: Smith Group Critical Group and Sandpile Groupmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations