2017
DOI: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2017.04.01
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chinese consensus guidelines for diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal stromal tumor

Abstract: In order to further promote the standardization of diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) in China, the members of Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO) Expert Committee on GIST thoroughly discussed the key contents of the consensus guidelines, and voted on the controversial issue. In final, the Chinese consensus guidelines for the diagnosis and management of GIST (2017 edition) was formed on the basis of 2013 edition consensus guidelines, which is hereby announced. The consensu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
137
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(138 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
137
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is unclear whether these guidelines are appropriate for the clinical situation in Asian countries, especially China, given the long-lasting experience of selected Chinese centers [13]. The Chinese consensus guidelines for the diagnosis and management of GISTs were formulated in 2013 and updated in 2017, and differ from those of European countries in terms of clinical practice patterns [5]. In this review, we will summarize the clinical practice of both China and European countries and then discuss the similarities and differences between the European and Chinese GIST guidelines, although the fundamental approaches to the diagnostic and treatment strategy for GISTs are very similar.…”
Section: Clinical Management Guidelinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is unclear whether these guidelines are appropriate for the clinical situation in Asian countries, especially China, given the long-lasting experience of selected Chinese centers [13]. The Chinese consensus guidelines for the diagnosis and management of GISTs were formulated in 2013 and updated in 2017, and differ from those of European countries in terms of clinical practice patterns [5]. In this review, we will summarize the clinical practice of both China and European countries and then discuss the similarities and differences between the European and Chinese GIST guidelines, although the fundamental approaches to the diagnostic and treatment strategy for GISTs are very similar.…”
Section: Clinical Management Guidelinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IHC staining of GIST is recommended using a panel with five markers including CD117, DOG1, CD34, succinate dehydrogenase B (SDHB), and Ki67. SDHA markers could be added as appropriate [5,15,16]. …”
Section: Pathological Diagnosis and Genetic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In clinical practice, Chinese physicians refer to the Chinese consensus of GISTs, National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines, and European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) guidelines for clinical diagnosis and treatment . To our knowledge to date, 4 Chinese consensus versions have been updated, and the latest edition was published in 2017 in English . The Chinese consensus is based mainly on high‐level medical evidence worldwide and the research data for Chinese patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, unlike patients with high‐risk GISTs, for whom adjuvant therapy is recommended for 3 years, to our knowledge the duration of adjuvant therapy for patients with intermediate‐risk GISTs is not clearly specified; the ESMO guidelines recommend that a shared decision‐making process is needed when the risk is intermediate . Based on 2 Chinese studies, the Chinese consensus recommended that patients with GISTs located in the small intestine or rectum that are of intermediate risk should receive adjuvant therapy for 3years, whereas patients with gastric GISTs that are of intermediate risk only require adjuvant therapy for 1 year …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%