2016
DOI: 10.1177/0031512516648131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chinese College Test Takers’ Individual Differences and Reading Test Performance

Abstract: This study reports on the relationships between test takers' individual differences and their performance on a reading comprehension test. A total of 518 Chinese college students (252 women and 256 men; M age = 19.26 year, SD = 0.98) answered a questionnaire and sit for a reading comprehension test. The study found that test takers' L2 language proficiency was closely linked to their test performance. Test takers' employment of strategies was significantly and positively associated with their performance on th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They yield different results. The data collection procedures used include think-aloud protocols (Nam, 2015), questionnaire (Nemati, 2016;Zhang, 2016), post-task interview (Lee, 2015), pre-test and post-test (Takallou et al, 2016), and think-aloud protocols as learners took the test and categorised the protocols into reading strategies (Nosrati, 2015).…”
Section: Previous Studies and The Present Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They yield different results. The data collection procedures used include think-aloud protocols (Nam, 2015), questionnaire (Nemati, 2016;Zhang, 2016), post-task interview (Lee, 2015), pre-test and post-test (Takallou et al, 2016), and think-aloud protocols as learners took the test and categorised the protocols into reading strategies (Nosrati, 2015).…”
Section: Previous Studies and The Present Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was performed to assess the construct validity of the positive and negative emotions in the current data. The recommended values for a good model fit were: χ 2 /df < 3 (Kline, 2016;Zhang, 2016), the comparative fit index (CFI) and the Tucker-Lewis index (TLI) ≥ .90 (Zhang, 2016), and Standardized Root Mean Square Residual (SRMR) < .05 (Byrne, 2016). SRMR was used due to the small sample size (Iacobucci, 2010).…”
Section: Conceptual Test and Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Metacognitive and Cognitive Strategy Questionnaire was used in this study because of its theoretical lineage related to metacognition (e.g., Paris and Winograd, 1990 ; Wenden, 1998 ) and previous validation of this questionnaire with Chinese university EFL students (e.g., Zhang et al, 2014 ; Zhang, 2016 ; Zhang, 2018 ). The CFA results for the strategy questionnaire revealed acceptable model fit ( x 2 /df = 1.70 < 3, CFI = 0.91, RMSEA = 0.03, SRMR = 0.05).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%