2006
DOI: 10.4000/chinaperspectives.3103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

China's Search for Cultural and National Identity from the Nineteenth Century to the Present

Abstract: This article describes and analyses crucial elements of cultural and national identitybuilding in China from the nineteenth century to the present, in particular the response of China's intellectual elite to Western influences. In this context, I will first touch briefly on similar phenomena in other regions, such as Russia, the Arabic world, and Germany. By doing so, I hope to show that what happened in China was, and is, not an isolated case but typical of modernising societies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although it initially relied heavily on the West as a benchmark of success, since the turn of the twenty‐first century, China has adopted a more aggressive and assertive approach to nation‐building, defining its own values and perspective (i.e. the China model), with Chinese national identity prescribed under the ‘One‐China policy’, which manifests itself in the unification of different races and ethnicities, including Tibetans and Uyghurs, as well as the Taiwanese, Hongkongers and Macanese (Cheung ; Meissner ).…”
Section: Division and The Post‐1990s Queer/tongzhi Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although it initially relied heavily on the West as a benchmark of success, since the turn of the twenty‐first century, China has adopted a more aggressive and assertive approach to nation‐building, defining its own values and perspective (i.e. the China model), with Chinese national identity prescribed under the ‘One‐China policy’, which manifests itself in the unification of different races and ethnicities, including Tibetans and Uyghurs, as well as the Taiwanese, Hongkongers and Macanese (Cheung ; Meissner ).…”
Section: Division and The Post‐1990s Queer/tongzhi Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On account of its long historical presence and role of structuration of Chinese society, Confucianism was favored by many to represent Chineseness. Attempts were even made to set up Confucianism as the exclusive national religion (Duara 1995;Goossaert and Palmer 2011;Jensen 1997;Meissner 2006). The New Life Movement sponsored by Chiang Kai-shek's Republican government (1934)(1935)(1936)(1937)(1938)(1939)(1940)(1941)(1942)(1943)(1944)(1945)(1946)(1947)(1948)(1949) sought to rehabilitate Confucian values and moral standards and inculcate them in people's everyday life on the grounds that Confucianism embodied Chinese national essence (Duara 1995).…”
Section: Symbolic Boundaries Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, much has happened in the heartland of Mainland China that might have made people accustomed to relating religion to national identity in this rapidly modernizing country. The postsocialist party‐state has downplayed communist ideology and resorted to traditional Chinese culture as symbolic resources for legitimacy and national solidarity (Meissner ; Potter ; Wu ). Confucianism, Buddhism, and Daoism are redeemed—albeit not without caution on the part of the Chinese government—as essential elements of the Chinese cultural tradition and constitutive of the Chinese identity (Billioud and Thoraval ; Ji ; Meissner ; Sun ; Wu ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many scholars argue modern notions of race in contemporary China emerged after the Opium Wars with a shift in governmental reasoning (Dikotter, ; Meissner, ; Sigley, ). During this time, they argue, nationality became equated with race and produced a construction of the Han race (90% of Chinese population) as a way to resist foreign power and influence, minimize internal divisions, legitimize Chinese sovereignty (Sigley, 1998), and foster identification with the nation state (Oakes & Schein, ).…”
Section: Sociohistorical Context Of Racial Thinking In Chinamentioning
confidence: 99%