2017
DOI: 10.1093/cjip/pox002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

China’s Normative Power in Managing South China Sea Disputes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, China had either negotiated or signed various economic partnerships and free trade agreements with ASEAN, South Korea, and Australia by 2014. In the physical aspect, the BRI and the establishment of the AIIB served as the follow-up actions and became crucial policy tools for China's policy on the geopolitics of Asia, including East Asia (Han, 2017; Li, 2020; Ross, 2019; Weissmann, 2020; Yuan, 2018). Contrary to that, the US under the Obama administration experienced worsening relations with its allies; for example, related to the US position on the 2014 Thailand military coup, the US role in the Malaysia 1MDB scandal in 2015, the position of the US towards the Philippines’ aggressive anti-drug policy in 2016 (Tan, 2020).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, China had either negotiated or signed various economic partnerships and free trade agreements with ASEAN, South Korea, and Australia by 2014. In the physical aspect, the BRI and the establishment of the AIIB served as the follow-up actions and became crucial policy tools for China's policy on the geopolitics of Asia, including East Asia (Han, 2017; Li, 2020; Ross, 2019; Weissmann, 2020; Yuan, 2018). Contrary to that, the US under the Obama administration experienced worsening relations with its allies; for example, related to the US position on the 2014 Thailand military coup, the US role in the Malaysia 1MDB scandal in 2015, the position of the US towards the Philippines’ aggressive anti-drug policy in 2016 (Tan, 2020).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While recognizing the importance of shared objectives and values in multilateral cooperation, Chan adopting a "soft balance" perspective, contends that through providing regional public goods to Eurasian countries, China exploits the acknowledgement and acceptance of its leadership to moderately compete with the existing hegemony of the US, and the purpose is to establish new rules and norms [17]. Meanwhile, Han questioned the efficacy of China's efforts to promote norms, particularly in light of ASEAN's commitment to multilateralism and maintaining its own centrality as it has constrained China's ability to resolve conflicts with member countries that have emerged from the South China Sea dispute [18].…”
Section: Interactions In Multilateral Forumsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Amit Singh (2012) presents the reason why the South China Sea's disputes are a regional issue but able to catch the attention of the world. David Guo Xiong Han (2017) highlights the relationship between China and ASEAN. Han (2017) argues that China has sought to be recognized as a 'normative power' by this bloc.…”
Section: Literature Review and Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…David Guo Xiong Han (2017) highlights the relationship between China and ASEAN. Han (2017) argues that China has sought to be recognized as a 'normative power' by this bloc. Broadly speaking, scholars, especially from Western countries, do not take sides in the disputes.…”
Section: Literature Review and Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%