China’s Industrial Total-Factor Energy Productivity Growth at Sub-Industry Level: A Two-Step Stochastic Metafrontier Malmquist Index Approach

Abstract

Under the concept of metafrontier, technology gap ratio is alternatively interpreted as potential energy efficiency. Combined with Malmquist index framework and Shephard energy distance function, we then develop a metafrontier Malmquist energy productivity index to analyze the total-factor energy productivity growth with four specific components: groupfrontier efficiency change index, groupfrontier technological change index, efficiency catch-up index and technological catch-up index. Methodologically, a newly developed two-step stochastic metafrontier analysis is applied to address the potentially biased estimation problems in the previous mixed approach. This analytical framework is used to evaluate the energy productivity growth of China's 35 sub-industries in industrial sector from 2001 to 2015. The main empirical results show that: (1) In terms of cumulative metafrontier Malmquist energy productivity growth, China's overall industry has witnessed a 25% growth and a U-shaped growing trend bottoming out in 2006; meanwhile, 19 sub-industries have suffered an energy productivity loss and the remaining 16 sub-industries have experienced an energy productivity gain. (2) From the technology heterogeneity perspective, light industry outperforms heavy industry in metafrontier Malmquist energy productivity growth, while the intra-group and inter-group energy productivity develops roughly in balance for overall industry. (3) The change of metafrontier Malmquist energy productivity is mainly driven by technological change components rather than efficiency change components. On average, groupfrontier technological change makes the biggest contribution to energy productivity growth, followed by technological catch-up, then efficiency catch-up, and groupfrontier efficiency change is last. (4) The metafrontier Malmquist energy productivity growth has shown a significant convergence in heavy industry and light industry, as well as overall industry.

Drivers and Policy Choices of Industrial Total-Factor Coal Productivity: Evidence From Eastern China

“…According to the empirical results of Shanghai and Fujian, the increase in ECI leads to an increase in the industrial TCP. Considering the bias of energy intensity indicators, the reduction of regional energy efficiency does not mean the decrease of industrial TCP (Cao et al, 2017).…”

Modeling the building blocks of country‐level absorptive capacity: Comparing developed and emergent economies

“…As we employed the technological frontier distance (technology gap) as a proxy for AC following Girma (2005), another suggestion for a future study would be the calculation of TFP using nonparametric frameworks such as the Malmquist index (Cao et al., 2017; L. H. Chen et al., 2016; Q. Fu & Ji, 2017; Mu et al., 2017).…”

Analysis of absorptive capacity and foreign direct investment in the productivity of Brazilian municipalities

“…TFP can be calculated using the Malmquist Index (MI). Several papers have employed the Malmquist Index as a proxy for TFP, such as Cao et al (2017), Mu et al (2017), Fu & Ji (2017) and Chen et al (2016).…”

“…In order to calculate IM, two inputs (Average income of workers and capital assets) and one output (municipal GDP) will be used, with orientation to the output CRS (Constant Returns to Scale), since it is possible to establish proportionality between inputs and outputs, that is, to increase GDP with the increase of Income and Capital (Cao et al, 2017;Mu et al, 2017;Fu & Ji, 2017;Chen et al, 2016).…”