2018
DOI: 10.1163/2667078x-01902002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

China’s Belt and Road Initiative in Central and Eastern Europe

Abstract: The Central and East European (CEE) part of the Eurasian landmass is often overlooked in the conversations on contemporary geopolitics. Yet, owing to China’s investment in the CEE countries, the region has been subject to growing strategic attention. This article offers a brief overview of the history of this relationship by focusing on the “16+1” mechanism. Nestled within the broader Belt and Road Initiative, the “16+1” has provided a unique regional arrangement for extending Chinese influence in the sixteen … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The number of CEE media accounts of interactions with either Brussels, Moscow, or Washington in the first three quarters of any year tends to be larger than the overall accounts of China in the pre-pandemic decade (Splichal, 2019). This development reflects distinct constructions of proximity in the CEE region, where events in the EU, Russia, or the United States are considered to have immediate bearing rather than those in China (Kavalski, 2018a). While such pattern reflects a general disinterest not just in China, but also in Asia, more generally, it also reveals the failure of Chinese public diplomacy to articulate the country's significance for the CEE region (Dubravcikova et al, 2019;Kavalski, 2018c).…”
Section: Localizing Chinamentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The number of CEE media accounts of interactions with either Brussels, Moscow, or Washington in the first three quarters of any year tends to be larger than the overall accounts of China in the pre-pandemic decade (Splichal, 2019). This development reflects distinct constructions of proximity in the CEE region, where events in the EU, Russia, or the United States are considered to have immediate bearing rather than those in China (Kavalski, 2018a). While such pattern reflects a general disinterest not just in China, but also in Asia, more generally, it also reveals the failure of Chinese public diplomacy to articulate the country's significance for the CEE region (Dubravcikova et al, 2019;Kavalski, 2018c).…”
Section: Localizing Chinamentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Fürst and Tesař (2014) investigated China's attractiveness in CEE as accredited by the post-ideological and post-transitional approach applied by China and CEE countries. With China's BRI and through its diplomacy, the broad level of economic cooperation has been accelerated in CEE countries (Kavalski, 2018;Matura, 2018;Pendrakowska, 2018;Vangeli, 2017). The initial discussion on investment flows and trade is deeply concerned with these initiatives in the countries of Central and Eastern Europe (Shang et al, 2016).…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study provides a view of the CEE countries, focusing on the influence of the CEE countries on Sino-European relations. From the perspective of identity geopolitics, Kavalski (2017Kavalski ( , 2018 has analyzed the different strategic discourses that prompted CEE countries to join the "17+1 Cooperation" in addition to economic factors, and compared the different identities of CEE countries relative to Europe as reflected in their relations with China. Matura (2019) examines trade, investment and politics between China and CEE countries.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%