Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2021.06.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chimpanzees combine pant hoots with food calls into larger structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
52
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
4
52
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To this end, contexts of vocal production require detailed analysis. While some chimpanzee single units have demonstrated context-specificity in previous studies (e.g., Crockford 41 ), the context-specificity of sequences remains largely uninvestigated (but see Leroux et al 44 ). In particular, whether the juxtaposition of single units into sequences leads to some meaning shifts is a promising area for future research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To this end, contexts of vocal production require detailed analysis. While some chimpanzee single units have demonstrated context-specificity in previous studies (e.g., Crockford 41 ), the context-specificity of sequences remains largely uninvestigated (but see Leroux et al 44 ). In particular, whether the juxtaposition of single units into sequences leads to some meaning shifts is a promising area for future research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We do not assess meaning in this study, but it is important to note that chimpanzee single-unit use can show high context-specificity across a relatively broad range of contexts compared to other species, including alarm, hunting, feeding and greeting 40 for a review see Crockford 41 . Chimpanzees also use single units within numerous vocal sequences, not only in their loud calls—pant hoot 42 , 43 —but in sequences occurring in contexts such as feeding, nesting, fusion, greeting, and travel 39 , 40 , 44 . The acoustic structure of calls emitted within a vocal sequence show acoustic fidelity to the calls emitted singularly 44 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In chimpanzees, stone tool use (Carvalho et al, 2008; Sirianni et al, 2015), termite fishing (Deblauwe et al, 2006), and digging for underground bee nests (Estienne et al, 2017) have been analysed as complex sequences of individual decisions. Similarly, vocal patterns of bats (Bohn et al, 2009), birds (Berwick et al, 2011; Engesser et al, 2016; Sasahara et al, 2012; ten Cate, 2014), cetaceans (Allen et al, 2019), rock hyraxes (Kershenbaum et al, 2012), and primates (Arcadi, 1996; Arnold & Zuberbühler, 2008; Clarke et al, 2006; Girard-Buttoz et al, 2022; Leroux et al, 2021; Ouattara et al, 2009) have been described as temporal sequences with different degrees of predictability, combinatorial complexity, and hierarchical structure. This has often been related to the evolution of syntax (Zuberbühler, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is unclear whether and to what extent those calls convey properties of a specific event to the audience (Crockford et al, 2015; Dezecache & Berthet, 2018; Dezecache et al, 2019). Regarding food-associated calls, previous studies suggest that call production is facilitated by larger food resources (Brosnan & de Waal, 2000; Hauser et al, 1993 [divisible food resources in particular]; Hauser & Wrangham, 1987; Leroux et al, 2021 [combinatorial use of calls in particular]; Slocombe et al, 2010; but see O’Bryan, 2015 for a null result) and more preferable types of food (Kalan & Boesch, 2015; Fedurek & Slocombe, 2013; but see O’Bryan, 2015 for an opposite result). Food-associated calls have been reported to attract other chimpanzees to a food patch, at least in some cases (Kalan & Boesch, 2015; O’Bryan et al, 2021; but see O’Bryan, 2015 for a null result).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%