1993
DOI: 10.1097/00007890-199306000-00012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chimerism and Donor-Specific Nonreactivity 27 to 29 Years After Kidney Allotransplantation

Abstract: Chimerism was demonstrated with immunocytochemical and/or polymerase chain reaction techniques in kidney allografts and in the native skin, lymph nodes, or blood of 5 of 5 patients who received continuously functioning renal transplants from 1 or 2 haplotype HLA mismatched consanguineous donors (4 parents, 1 aunt) 27-29 years ago. In the 4 cases where the kidney donor still was alive to provide stimulator lymphocytes for testing, these provoked no (n = 2) or modest (n = 2) MLR in contrast to vigorous MLR to th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
147
0
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 313 publications
(151 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(16 reference statements)
1
147
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although we believe that microchimerism is a requirement for long-term organ allograft acceptance, 1,2,26,27 there are limitations to the chimerism-inducing strategies. Recipient hematolymphopoietic cytoreduction or cytoablation unquestionably enhances the ease and extent of donor leukocyte engraftment, but the potential penalty with each further increment in cytoreduction is proportionate weakening of the biologic safety device (against GVHD and rejection) that is provided by the nullification effect of the dual cell populations, 34 as has been learned with conventional bone marrow allotransplantation.…”
Section: The Pittsburgh Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although we believe that microchimerism is a requirement for long-term organ allograft acceptance, 1,2,26,27 there are limitations to the chimerism-inducing strategies. Recipient hematolymphopoietic cytoreduction or cytoablation unquestionably enhances the ease and extent of donor leukocyte engraftment, but the potential penalty with each further increment in cytoreduction is proportionate weakening of the biologic safety device (against GVHD and rejection) that is provided by the nullification effect of the dual cell populations, 34 as has been learned with conventional bone marrow allotransplantation.…”
Section: The Pittsburgh Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2,26 These findings led to the development of the two-way paradigm to explain the immunologic relationship between the donor and the recipient 1,2,27 and ultimately to the Starzl/Zinkernagel explanation of acquired immunologic tolerance. 3 At the beginning, the simplistic therapeutic assumption was that if microchimerism was essential for long-term graft survival, the long-term prognosis, including achievement of drugfree tolerance, might be improved by augmenting the spontaneous chimerism with perioperative donor bone marrow.…”
Section: The Pittsburgh Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the first time, it was speculated in 1991 that graft chimerism might be a generic feature of all accepted grafts (13). This speculation soon was demonstrated with the kidney (14) and thoracic organs (15)(16)(17).…”
Section: After Intestinal Transplantationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, five of the ten longestsurviving patients bearing living-related kidney allografts have been completely off immunosuppression for between three and 30 years (Table 2). Patients 3 and 4, whose mixed lymphocyte response (MLR) tests to donor and third party targets were profoundly depressed prior to weaning 44 , had gradual restoration of MLR to both in the drug-free state, but with no evidence of rejection.…”
Section: Chimerism: Level and Durationmentioning
confidence: 99%