2013
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2013.00171
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chimeric RXFP1 and RXFP2 Receptors Highlight the Similar Mechanism of Activation Utilizing Their N-Terminal Low-Density Lipoprotein Class A Modules

Abstract: Relaxin family peptide (RXFP) receptors 1 and 2 are unique G-protein coupled receptors in that they contain an N-terminal low-density lipoprotein type A (LDLa) module which is necessary for receptor activation. The current hypothesis suggests that upon ligand binding the LDLa module interacts with the transmembrane (TM) domain of a homodimer partner receptor to induce the active receptor conformations. We recently demonstrated that three residues in the N-terminus of the RXFP1 LDLa module are potentially invol… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
31
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies using chimeric RXFP1 and RXFP2 receptors with their LDLa modules swapped C-terminally to the final cysteine residue of the module demonstrate that RXFP2 likely uses a similar mechanism to drive receptor activation. Importantly the chimeric receptors were still able to bind ligand normally and were also able to signal, albeit with altered activity compared with wild-type receptors (Bruell et al, 2013). Furthermore, when the TM domains of the RXFP1 chimera with an RXFP2 LDLa (RXFP211) were swapped to match the LDLa module (RXFP212) the activity of the receptor approached wild type, suggesting a specific interaction between the LDLa module and the receptor TM domains.…”
Section: B Structural Features Of Relaxin Family Peptide Receptorsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Studies using chimeric RXFP1 and RXFP2 receptors with their LDLa modules swapped C-terminally to the final cysteine residue of the module demonstrate that RXFP2 likely uses a similar mechanism to drive receptor activation. Importantly the chimeric receptors were still able to bind ligand normally and were also able to signal, albeit with altered activity compared with wild-type receptors (Bruell et al, 2013). Furthermore, when the TM domains of the RXFP1 chimera with an RXFP2 LDLa (RXFP211) were swapped to match the LDLa module (RXFP212) the activity of the receptor approached wild type, suggesting a specific interaction between the LDLa module and the receptor TM domains.…”
Section: B Structural Features Of Relaxin Family Peptide Receptorsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Modeling studies suggest that A-chain residues in relaxin and INSL3 interact with this potential binding site (Hartley et al, 2009), but this has yet to be fully characterized. The current model of activation of RXFP1 and RXFP2 suggests that ligand binding to the LRRs and TM ECLs directs the LDLa to interact with the TM domain of a receptor homodimer partner to drive receptor activation (Kong et al, 2010;Bruell et al, 2013). However this model still requires experimental verification using site-directed mutagenesis or other methods that prevent dimer formation.…”
Section: B Structural Features Of Relaxin Family Peptide Receptorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mutant receptor expressing cells were then selected for semistable expression by Zeocin selection followed by FACS using a fluorescently tagged FLAG antibody 1 week later as previously described (24). HEK293T cells stably expressing WT RXFP1 were used as a positive control in the FACS sort, and only the top 10% of cells with fluorescence levels significantly higher than the background fluorescence in nontransfected HEK293T control cells were collected.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…action demonstrated the possibility of the LDLa module also having access to the TM domain of receptors (44). Functional characterization of LDLa-less, chimeric, and mutant receptors has demonstrated a critical functional role for the LDLa module (10,24). Because of the inability of concentrating EL1/EL2-GB1 beyond ϳ200 M, 15 N-LDLa was titrated to only equimolar with EL1/EL2-GB1.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Saturation-binding studies using Eu-labeled human H2 RLN (Eu-H2 RLN) were performed on whole cells as described previously ( 12 ). Cells stably expressing RXFP1 ( 13 ) or with a semi-stable transfection of R1-RXFP1 selected using FACS ( 14 ) were used in this experiment. Increasing concentrations of Eu-H2 RLN (0.1–50 nM) were utilized and non-specific binding was determined in presence of 1 μM of unlabeled H2 RLN.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%