This article examines the politics of literacy during the administration of Chilean President Eduardo Frei. Literacy training was an essential part of Christian Democratic efforts to promote agrarian reform and rural unionisation and incorporate the peasantry into the Chilean political system. Paulo Freire, working for the ministries of agriculture and education, was able to employ his innovative ' consciousness raising ' techniques throughout Chile. In practice, the campaign often blurred the line between creating a critical consciousness and creating a Christian Democratic consciousness, while Freire himself became caught up in political struggles within the administration over the extent and pace of reform.Illiteracy in the Latin America of the 1960s became a major issue with implications for the distribution of power in urbanising societies. The Cuban Revolution claimed to have reduced the number of people who could not read and write from 23 per cent to less than four per cent through the voluntary efforts of adults and secondary school students. 1 Responding to this challenge from the Cuban government, the US-sponsored Alliance for Progress, as part of its plan to modernise Latin America and promote social reform in order to prevent revolution, promised to end illiteracy in the region by 1970. Within that Cold War context, as well as within the general post-war drive for social and economic development, Paulo Freire had developed new techniques for training adults to read and write. These would not reach their Andrew J. Kirkendall is an Associate Professor of History at Texas A&M University.* Funding for the research for this article was provided by Texas A&M University's College of Liberal Arts Faculty Research Enhancement Award programme, Center for Humanities Research fellowship programme and the history department. The author wishes to express his gratitude for the helpful suggestions provided by those colleagues in his department who, in the spring of 2002, were still untenured, as well as those from the three anonymous JLAS reviewers.