1990
DOI: 10.2307/3338215
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chile after Pinochet: Aylwin's Christian Democrat Economic Policies for the 1990s

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Navia (2008) asserts that "[e]xcept for human rights and a consolidated democracy, Chile today looks very much as Pinochet wanted" (252). As predicted by Hojman (1990), Patricio Aylwin, the first democratically elected president after Pinochet, had every intention of continuing Pinochet's economic policies. After the transition in 1990 and despite criticizing neoliberal reforms, Navia (2008) established that the ruling posttransition Concertación continued to support many of the policies within the Washington Consensus (252n5).…”
Section: Chile's Posttransition Economic Policymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Navia (2008) asserts that "[e]xcept for human rights and a consolidated democracy, Chile today looks very much as Pinochet wanted" (252). As predicted by Hojman (1990), Patricio Aylwin, the first democratically elected president after Pinochet, had every intention of continuing Pinochet's economic policies. After the transition in 1990 and despite criticizing neoliberal reforms, Navia (2008) established that the ruling posttransition Concertación continued to support many of the policies within the Washington Consensus (252n5).…”
Section: Chile's Posttransition Economic Policymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…More than anything, the Chilean transition reflected the desire of democratic political parties to take control from the military and move the state away from its association with repression. The capitalist economic model which the authoritarian state had implemented from 1975, which clearly favoured large domestic economic groups and international business interests (see Hojman 1990Hojman , 1995 over organised labour and the Chilean poor, was not a source of antagonism. To cater for the social impacts of market failures, the democratic administration would busy itself with a national agenda of inclusion, tolerance and equity.…”
Section: A Decade Of Transitionmentioning
confidence: 99%