Abstract:Informed by data extracted from 30,921 police electronic custody records, drawn from 44 police stations across four police force areas and including 5,153 records of juveniles aged 10 to 17 years, this article examines the take-up of legal advice by children and young people in police stations in England and Wales. There are wide variations in the extent to which juveniles request and receive legal advice when compared to adults but also between juveniles of different ages. Such variations are explored both in… Show more
“…33 This provides further support to the contention that children and young people are perhaps more vulnerable to being criminalised when compared with adults. Young suspects are also less likely to request legal advice (see Kemp, Pleasance & Balmer 2011), thus potentially further exacerbating their vulnerability. However, more recent developments paint a perhaps more optimistic picture with the abandonment of policies founded on targets and a move towards greater diversion of children and young people out of the formal system (see Bateman 2015): 'the indicator that replaced [the 'offences brought to justice' target] had a converse impetus, encouraging the police to respond in an informal manner to children who had had no previous contact with the youth justice system' (Bateman 2015, p.11).…”
Section: Precarious Positioning: Vulnerable or Villainous?mentioning
This paper, drawing upon qualitative data produced through interviews with custody officers (COs) at two custody suites in England, examines how the vulnerability of children and young people is conceptualised generally, within the criminal process, and then, more specifically, in police custody. It uses the appropriate adult (AA) safeguard under Code C to the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 as the point of reference and explores, firstly, how childhood is conceptualised and, secondly, how childhood vulnerability is understood by COs. The responses of COs are perhaps indicative of a wider issue within the criminal processthe construction of youth and childhood and, accordingly, the criminal law response to children and young people. Within this paper, whilst it is accepted that childhood and vulnerability are non-static concepts, it is nevertheless contended that children and young people are vulnerable, particularly when facing the criminal process.
“…33 This provides further support to the contention that children and young people are perhaps more vulnerable to being criminalised when compared with adults. Young suspects are also less likely to request legal advice (see Kemp, Pleasance & Balmer 2011), thus potentially further exacerbating their vulnerability. However, more recent developments paint a perhaps more optimistic picture with the abandonment of policies founded on targets and a move towards greater diversion of children and young people out of the formal system (see Bateman 2015): 'the indicator that replaced [the 'offences brought to justice' target] had a converse impetus, encouraging the police to respond in an informal manner to children who had had no previous contact with the youth justice system' (Bateman 2015, p.11).…”
Section: Precarious Positioning: Vulnerable or Villainous?mentioning
This paper, drawing upon qualitative data produced through interviews with custody officers (COs) at two custody suites in England, examines how the vulnerability of children and young people is conceptualised generally, within the criminal process, and then, more specifically, in police custody. It uses the appropriate adult (AA) safeguard under Code C to the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 as the point of reference and explores, firstly, how childhood is conceptualised and, secondly, how childhood vulnerability is understood by COs. The responses of COs are perhaps indicative of a wider issue within the criminal processthe construction of youth and childhood and, accordingly, the criminal law response to children and young people. Within this paper, whilst it is accepted that childhood and vulnerability are non-static concepts, it is nevertheless contended that children and young people are vulnerable, particularly when facing the criminal process.
“…First, often a child and/or an appropriate adult consents to an interview without a solicitor present (Kemp et al, 2011; Pierpoint, 2011; Taylor, 2016). PACE 1984 allows for situations when a detainee can be questioned without a solicitor present and although there are wide variations in the request rates for legal advice by children (Kemp et al, 2011), suspects aged 10–13 are less likely to seek legal advice (Pleasence et al, 2011). Charlie Taylor recommended that there should be a presumption that a solicitor attends and there is training provided to them on how to work with young clients.…”
During the last 30 years, the way in which children give evidence in the criminal justice system in England and Wales has been radically transformed. These reforms have, however, neglected child suspects in the police station. Recent piecemeal reforms to the statutory regime for children in police detention have overlooked a critical stage of the criminal justice process: the police interview. This article critically analyses the policy, practice and law surrounding police questioning of child suspects. It demonstrates that the absence of child-specific guidance when interviewing child suspects is not only out of step with wider reforms, but carries real risks regarding the effective communication and participation of child suspects.
“…This is a particular issue given the potential complexity of the role the appropriate adult may be required to play (Parry, 2006). It has been suggested, however, that relatives of the young person may not always be suitable to act as an appropriate adult (Kemp et al, 2011: 38) and therefore deeper consideration of what the role entails in practice is needed. It has been noted in the United Kingdom that ensuring access to appropriate adults can have an impact on requests for legal representation (Kemp et al, 2011: 37) and therefore may have a significant impact on the way in which children’s rights are realised.…”
Section: Effective Participation At the Pre-trial And Investigation Smentioning
The right of the child defendant to participate effectively in criminal proceedings is a fundamental aspect of the right to a fair trial, and is guaranteed under a number of international instruments, including the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. Ensuring that the right is realised at the domestic level requires States to take positive steps to facilitate the child’s effective participation. This article examines how the child’s participation is supported through statutory provisions and by the courts in Ireland and New Zealand. The discussion highlights challenges and positive steps taken to facilitate effective participation in domestic law.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.