2016
DOI: 10.1111/cogs.12446
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Children's Representation and Imitation of Events: How Goal Organization Influences 3‐Year‐Old Children's Memory for Action Sequences

Abstract: Children's imitation of adults plays a prominent role in human cognitive development. However, few studies have investigated how children represent the complex structure of observed actions which underlies their imitation. We integrate theories of action segmentation, memory, and imitation to investigate whether children's event representation is organized according to veridical serial order or a higher level goal structure. Children were randomly assigned to learn novel event sequences either through interact… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
27
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
3
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Across the entire sample, retention of temporal information, but not spatial information, uniquely declined from the recall to the future condition. This is consistent with research showing that children retain spatial information better than temporal information (Lee, Wendelken, Bunge, & Ghetti, 2016;Picard, Cousin, Guillery-Girard, Eustache, & Piolino, 2012) and experience unique difficulty at integrating temporal information in future-oriented actions (Burns & Russell, 2016;Hayne & Imuta, 2011;Loucks, Mutschler, & Meltzoff, 2017;McCormack & Hanley, 2011;Ribordy Lambert, Lavenex, & Banta Lavenex, 2017). It is remarkable that declines were observed when children could have "simply" reproduced the same action sequences that were enacted in response to the recall task only a few moments earlier.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Across the entire sample, retention of temporal information, but not spatial information, uniquely declined from the recall to the future condition. This is consistent with research showing that children retain spatial information better than temporal information (Lee, Wendelken, Bunge, & Ghetti, 2016;Picard, Cousin, Guillery-Girard, Eustache, & Piolino, 2012) and experience unique difficulty at integrating temporal information in future-oriented actions (Burns & Russell, 2016;Hayne & Imuta, 2011;Loucks, Mutschler, & Meltzoff, 2017;McCormack & Hanley, 2011;Ribordy Lambert, Lavenex, & Banta Lavenex, 2017). It is remarkable that declines were observed when children could have "simply" reproduced the same action sequences that were enacted in response to the recall task only a few moments earlier.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The results of Experiment 2 suggest that an important aspect of early episodic future thinking development is the understanding that past knowledge can be useful to help address future problems and goals. This connection becomes particularly important given recent literature that has underscored the role of goal structure in organizing event representations and guiding event memory in early childhood (Bekkering, Wohlschlager, & Gattis, 2000;Gleissner, Bekkering, & Meltzoff, 2000;Loucks & Meltzoff, 2013;Loucks et al, 2017;Williamson & Markman, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extensive research with adults suggests that event memory is functionally dependent on how the event was segmented (Flores et al, ; Sargent et al, ; Swallow et al, ; Zacks et al, ), and research with children provides further insights into how memory preserves event structure that is created during event segmentation. Imitation research reveals that 3‐year‐olds’ memories for observed action events, both familiar and novel, are organized based on hierarchical goal structure rather than the temporal order in which the actions were observed (Loucks & Meltzoff, ; Loucks, Mutschler, & Meltzoff, ), suggesting children segment events according to goal hierarchies and preserve this segmentation in their memory for the events.…”
Section: Significance Of Event Segmentation For Other Developmental Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When important situation features change, such as new movements, spatial location, characters, objects, causes, and goals, then prediction error spikes. As a result, the current event model is updated and this is experienced as an event boundary [8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14]. This can be revealed by explicitly asking people to indicate the boundaries between events during comprehension [15, 16]; this has been done for videos of everyday activities [17, 18], dance movements [19] and visual and written narratives [20, 21].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%