2019
DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/gtzqv
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Children’s Reading Difficulties, Language, and Reflections on the Simple View of Reading

Abstract: Reading comprehension is a complex task which depends on a range of cognitive and linguistic processes. According to the Simple View of Reading, this complexity can be captured as the product of two sets of skills: decoding and linguistic comprehension. The Simple View explains variance in reading comprehension and provides a good framework to guide the classification of reading disorders. This paper discusses how weaknesses in either or both of components of the Simple View are implicated in children’s readin… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
30
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In the original study by Gough and Tunmer, these two dimensions were measured by means of a pseudoword reading task and a listening comprehension task. There is a broad agreement on the importance of both skill sets explained in the SVR for the prediction of reading comprehension (eg, Catts et al., 2015; Nation, 2019).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the original study by Gough and Tunmer, these two dimensions were measured by means of a pseudoword reading task and a listening comprehension task. There is a broad agreement on the importance of both skill sets explained in the SVR for the prediction of reading comprehension (eg, Catts et al., 2015; Nation, 2019).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More commonly described as ‘poor comprehenders’, these children have at least age‐appropriate phonological and reading accuracy skills, but show relative weaknesses in accessing meaning from language (Nation & Snowling, 1998). An estimated ~5% of children show such difficulties (Nation, 2019), and these comprehension problems frequently co‐occur with poor oral language skills (Catts, Adlof, & Weismer, 2006). Although there are many putative causes of poor comprehension, a wealth of evidence points to weaker performance on standardised tests of vocabulary in poor comprehenders than typically developing peers, with this performance gap widening across the school years (Cain & Oakhill, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SVR: A DIFFERENT VIEW 28 I wrote this reflection paper on the SVR framework because of what I perceived were misunderstandings and misuse of terms and constructs, as well as for the tasks used to assess those confused terms and constructs. I acknowledge, as others have (e.g., Catts, 2018;Nation, 2019), that the SVR likely does not represent completely the complex nature of reading comprehension, such as how students take the information gleaned from texts and develop a coherent mental representation or model of the materials to be understood (e.g., Kim & Phillips, 2014;Kintsch, 1998;2005). Nevertheless, to best understand the contributors to reading comprehension, it seems important to acknowledge that metalinguistic skills play an important role.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%