Abstract:2Planning plays an important role in the production of children's written texts. Yet little is 3 known about why children plan and the plans they create when they are not explicitly 4 instructed in planning activities. The current study explores the plans that elementary school 5 children create before writing a text. We compared performance of children educated in 6Catalan and in English (UK) to capture contextual differences and examined whether the 7 plans children produced were related to their language an… Show more
“…The results of this study provide additional evidence that advance planning plays a significant role in CBM-WE performance as early as Grade 2 and that the role of advance planning is not completely shared by transcription. This finding is similar to some other studies of elementary students (Llaurado & Dockrell, 2019;Puranik et al, 2019), but in contrast to studies suggesting that planning is a higherlevel EF that does not develop until later (Drijbooms et al, 2015;Limpo et al, 2014). Given the lack of consensus and the inconsistent developmental arc we described in the introduction, we hypothesize that our result is due to capturing the right constructs in the right developmental stage.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The role of planning for young writers has been conditional on a variety of factors, including the representation of planning and its relation to transcription. Llaurado and Dockrell (2019) found that planning influenced writing length, fluency, and quality in a sample of Years 1, 3, and 5 students. Planning was scored based on structure (1–3 points) and content (0–3 points).…”
Section: Roles Of Planning In Early Writingmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…For example, curriculum-based measurement in written expression (CBM-WE) captures aspects of transcription and text generation (Kim et al, 2017). However, the role of planning for early elementary student development and its influence on writing assessment is less conclusive (Altemeier et al, 2006; Drijbooms et al, 2015; Llaurado & Dockrell, 2019; Puranik et al, 2019).…”
The development of written expression includes transcription, text generation, and executive functions (including planning) interacting within working memory. However, executive functions are not formally measured in school-based written expression tasks although there is an opportunity for examining students’ advance planning—a key manifestation of executive functions. We explore the influence of advance planning on Grade 2 written expression using curriculum-based measurement in written expression (CBM-WE) probes with a convenience sample of 126 students in six classrooms. Controlling for transcription, which is typically the primary focus of instruction in early elementary grades, we found that a score on advance planning explained additional significant variance in writing quantity and accuracy. Results support that planning may be an additional score to add to the use of CBM-WE. Implications for assessment and further research on the early development of planning and executive functions related to written expression are explored.
“…The results of this study provide additional evidence that advance planning plays a significant role in CBM-WE performance as early as Grade 2 and that the role of advance planning is not completely shared by transcription. This finding is similar to some other studies of elementary students (Llaurado & Dockrell, 2019;Puranik et al, 2019), but in contrast to studies suggesting that planning is a higherlevel EF that does not develop until later (Drijbooms et al, 2015;Limpo et al, 2014). Given the lack of consensus and the inconsistent developmental arc we described in the introduction, we hypothesize that our result is due to capturing the right constructs in the right developmental stage.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The role of planning for young writers has been conditional on a variety of factors, including the representation of planning and its relation to transcription. Llaurado and Dockrell (2019) found that planning influenced writing length, fluency, and quality in a sample of Years 1, 3, and 5 students. Planning was scored based on structure (1–3 points) and content (0–3 points).…”
Section: Roles Of Planning In Early Writingmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…For example, curriculum-based measurement in written expression (CBM-WE) captures aspects of transcription and text generation (Kim et al, 2017). However, the role of planning for early elementary student development and its influence on writing assessment is less conclusive (Altemeier et al, 2006; Drijbooms et al, 2015; Llaurado & Dockrell, 2019; Puranik et al, 2019).…”
The development of written expression includes transcription, text generation, and executive functions (including planning) interacting within working memory. However, executive functions are not formally measured in school-based written expression tasks although there is an opportunity for examining students’ advance planning—a key manifestation of executive functions. We explore the influence of advance planning on Grade 2 written expression using curriculum-based measurement in written expression (CBM-WE) probes with a convenience sample of 126 students in six classrooms. Controlling for transcription, which is typically the primary focus of instruction in early elementary grades, we found that a score on advance planning explained additional significant variance in writing quantity and accuracy. Results support that planning may be an additional score to add to the use of CBM-WE. Implications for assessment and further research on the early development of planning and executive functions related to written expression are explored.
“…It is noteworthy that the vast majority of studies in this group focus on reading not writing, and that all studies reviewed confined their interest to the reading and writing of print text rather than multiple modes or media. The three studies that focus on writing trace the relative competence of children of different ages in writing certain text types (Tolchinsky, 2019;Stavans et al, 2019) and in planning for writing (Llaurado and Dockrell, 2019). In recent years, as explored earlier, some countries have expanded their literacy curricula to include skills associated with making and using multimodal and/or digital texts.…”
Section: Literacy As a Set Of Skills (55 Articles)mentioning
Literacy research has an important role to play in helping to shape educational policy and practice. The field of literacy research however is difficult to navigate as literacy has been understood and researched in many different ways. It encompasses work from psychology, sociology, philosophy and neuroscience, literary theory, media and literacy studies, and methodologies include a range of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. In mapping this complex field, I draw on a systematic ‘scoping survey’ of a sample of peerreviewed articles featuring literacy research relevant to literacy education for children aged 5-11. Studies were deemed relevant if they: addressed literacy pedagogies and interventions; and/or provided pertinent insights (e.g. into children’s experiences of literacy); and/or offered implications for the range and scope of literacy education. The results of this survey are important in two ways. Firstly they help to articulate the range of literacy research and the varied ways that such research might speak to literacy education. Secondly they challenge easy distinctions between paradigms in literacy research. Recognising this complexity and heterogeneity matters given the history of relationships between literacy policy and practice in countries such as England, where polarised debate has often erased the subtle differences of perspective and confluence of interest that this survey illuminates. Based on the results of this survey I argue that an inclusive approach to literacy research is needed in educational contexts. Otherwise alternative and/or complementary ways of supporting children’s literacy learning may be missed, as will important possibilities for literacy education and children’s current and future lives.
“…These few studies increase the need for a greater research effort to find out what the written communication problems of students with intellectual disabilities are in order to implement specific interventions tailored to their needs. However, the difficulty of analysing and fully understanding the global process of written composition and the relevance given to reflecting on writing (Hayes, 1996 ) made this research focus on the cognitive process of planning, considered as a central component of written expression (Llaurado & Dockrell, 2019 ; McCutchen, 2006 ).…”
Background: Studies on the writing of students with intellectual disabilities have been scarce and unrepresentative. Therefore, the purpose of this research was to analyse this group of students' abilities to plan their texts Method: A collective case study was carried out, with an eminently qualitative approach, although aided by an initial quantitative analysis. Fifteen students with unspecified intellectual disabilities were interviewed using open-ended questions.For data interpretation, content analysis and quantification of responses were used.
Results:The results revealed the abilities and limitations of these students regarding the knowledge and use of one of the key processes of written expression (writing planning).
Conclusion:The cognitive operations of planning, in which these students admitted the greatest problems, were the ordering and recording of ideas, and textual structuring.students with unspecified intellectual disabilities, writing difficulties, writing planning
| INTRODUCTIONWriting is a complex cognitive skill that challenges many students and especially those with an intellectual disability. However, people with intellectual disabilities are not homogeneous (Beail & Williams, 2014;Palmqvist et al., 2020). Intellectual disability is generally associated with certain syndromes, but there are also people with unspecified intellectual development disorders (WHO, ICD, 2015 10, Version 2015.Research has revealed that people with intellectual disabilities have difficulties reaching certain educational levels, primarily in the
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.