We would also like to thank members of the research policy steering group who reviewed the progress of the research and advised and commented on draft materials etc. It is our Policymakers and local authorities will also need to consider such a rebalancing beyond the provision of 'child' services, as many young disabled people move into adulthood whilst still living with their family carers. Such a transition point is often felt as catastrophic by families as an array of family supports, including short breaks, are drastically reduced as their child officially becomes an adult, although the needs of the disabled young person and their family carers may change little over this transition point.
Page 12Factors associated with main carer using a narrower range of adult-focused health and welfare services in the last 3 months Univariate Associations (*p<0.05; **p<0.(n=154, % correct classification 87.0%-90.9%, Nagelkerke R 2 =0.36) Child lower SDQ total difficulties Main carer not longstanding illness/disability Household managing better financially Wald (p) 12.69 (p<0.001) 4.79 (p=0.029) 9.17 (p=0.002) Factors associated with main carer greater satisfaction with life Univariate Associations (*p<0.05; **p<0.Table 80 Factors associated with the disabled child's usage of a wider range of child-focused services in the last 3 months, data from respondents to main carer questionnaires Factors associated with disabled child usage of a wider range of child-focused services in the last 3 months Univariate Associations (*p<0.05; **p<0.Short break family experience/satisfaction: Logistic Regression Disabled child usage of a wider range of child-focused services for children in last 3 months (median split, n=191, % correct classification 57.1%-71.7%, Nagelkerke R 2 =0.23) Child not in Target Group A Child needs more supervision 10pm-6am Child uses a wider range of short breaks Wald (p) 9.55 (p=0.002) 16.19 (p<0.001) 5.57 (p=0.018) Logistic Regression Disabled child lower SDQ emotional symptoms (median split, n=240, % correct classification 60.4%-70.0%, Nagelkerke R 2 =0.18) Child not in Target Group D Child in TDC Priority Group B Child uses centre-based short breaks Main carer satisfaction: extent to which short break providers listen to the family Wald (p) 7.86 (p=0.005) 6.93 (p=0.009) 5.13 (p=0.023) 9.04 (p=0.003) Factors associated with disabled child lower SDQ conduct problems Univariate Associations (*p<0.05; **p<0.Disabled child lower SDQ hyperactivity (median split, n=272, % correct classification 71.7%-77.2%, Nagelkerke R 2 =0.31) Child not in Target Group A Child not in Target Group D Child in Target Group E Older main carer age Wald (p) 16.20 (p<0.001) 22.63 (p<0.001) 13.93 (p<0.001) 8.10 (p=0.004)
Impact on well-being and behaviour, child using short breaks: qualitative analysisCarers reported increases in children's self esteem and self confidence; these were marked for some children whilst for others these were small but important changes."It has allowed Christopher to have a social life, to interact with his peer...