1995
DOI: 10.1016/0145-2134(95)00092-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Children's perceptions of the risk of sexual abuse

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is problematic because studies have also shown that children and young people often misjudge risks and mislabel potentially abusive behaviours as appropriate, insignificant or as their own fault (Ungar, Tutty, McConnell, Barter, & Fairholm, 2009). Findings show that adults and institutions need to understand how children perceive safety to better assist them to assess and manage risks (Jacobs, Hashima, & Kenning, 1995).…”
Section: The Value Of Gauging Children's Perceptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is problematic because studies have also shown that children and young people often misjudge risks and mislabel potentially abusive behaviours as appropriate, insignificant or as their own fault (Ungar, Tutty, McConnell, Barter, & Fairholm, 2009). Findings show that adults and institutions need to understand how children perceive safety to better assist them to assess and manage risks (Jacobs, Hashima, & Kenning, 1995).…”
Section: The Value Of Gauging Children's Perceptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only women were tested because they are more likely to report significant physical and sexual abuse histories, and the incidence of PNES is threefold higher in women (2,15,16) as reflected in our all-female index group. All participants enrolled in the study completed a shortened version of the Jacobs Neglect, Abandonment, and Abuse Protocol (J-NAAP) (17) administered by a clinician to determine the presence and severity of abuse/neglect. It assesses traumatic or stressful life events such as loss or abandonment, serious neglect, physical abuse, emotional abuse, and sexual abuse.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Religious commitment levels were measured using the Religious Commitment Inventory-10 (RCI-10) (47). The participants also completed a demographic survey and additional psychological surveys to assess their general psychological health, including the Jacobs Neglect, Abandonment and Abuse protocol (J-NAAP) (48), the Experiences in Close Relationships-Revised (ECR-R) (49), the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) (50), the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS) (51) and the Resilience Scale (RS) (52).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%