1997
DOI: 10.3758/bf03210804
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Children’s memory for counting-out rhymes: A cross-language comparison

Abstract: In English, counting-out rhymes, such as "Eenie Meenie,"vary little over retellings. Recall is not rote but is sensitive to the structure of the genre. To test the generality of this finding, a sample of Romanian rhymes was collected. Although there was no overlap with the English rhymes, the corpus of rhymes collected had similar structure in terms of number of lines, repeating words, rhyme, alliteration, and the inclusion of nonsense words. Variation within rhymes preserved the poetic structure of the genre.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, the high degree of interlinear phonological patterning in poetic texts, e.g., line-final rhymes and recurrent meter, seems to increase memorability, as suggested by Tillmann and Dowling (2007) . In this latter view, it is the systematic sound patterns that serve as effective retrieval cues in actual performance ( Rubin, 1995 ), but also in experimental recall and recognition paradigms ( Van Peer, 1990 ; Rubin et al, 1997 ; Hanauer, 1998b ; Tillmann and Dowling, 2007 ; Lea et al, 2008 ). Note that this explanation is compatible with a level-of-processing account under the additional assumption that the depth of processing varies as a function of the amount of systematic sound patterning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, the high degree of interlinear phonological patterning in poetic texts, e.g., line-final rhymes and recurrent meter, seems to increase memorability, as suggested by Tillmann and Dowling (2007) . In this latter view, it is the systematic sound patterns that serve as effective retrieval cues in actual performance ( Rubin, 1995 ), but also in experimental recall and recognition paradigms ( Van Peer, 1990 ; Rubin et al, 1997 ; Hanauer, 1998b ; Tillmann and Dowling, 2007 ; Lea et al, 2008 ). Note that this explanation is compatible with a level-of-processing account under the additional assumption that the depth of processing varies as a function of the amount of systematic sound patterning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While establishing speech rhythm is not at all trivial, rhythmic patterns appear to be a relatively easy cognitive task in regularly metered and rhymed poems even for children (Rubin et al, 1997). However, it remains unclear how it works in silent reading MRRL (i.e., metrically-regular, rhymed language), if subvocalization plays an important role in it, and whether eye-movements may reflect that.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent psycholinguistic research on rhyme and poetic meter, the focus has been almost exclusively on cognitive and other benefits. Specifically, rhyme and/or meter have been shown to enhance memorability (Bower & Bolton, 1969; Hanauer, 1996; Rubin, 1995; Rubin, Ciobanu, & Langston, 1997; Tillmann & Dowling, 2007), processing fluency (Dilley & McAuley, 2008; Hoorn, 1996; Menninghaus, Bohrn, Altmann, Lubrich, & Jacobs, 2014; Obermeier et al, 2016, 2013; Tilsen, 2011), truth attributions (McGlone & Tofighbakhsh, 1999, 2000), and in part also lexical access (Zwitserlood, 1996). Moreover, rhyme and meter enhanced ratings for beauty and the power to emotionally move readers (Menninghaus, Wagner, Wassiliwizky, Jacobsen, & Knoop, 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%