2008
DOI: 10.1080/17477160701645152
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Children's food preferences: Effects of weight status, food type, branding and television food advertisements (commercials)

Abstract: OBJECTIVE. To investigate the effects of weight status, food type and exposure to food and non-food advertisements on children's preference for branded and non-branded foods. DESIGN. A within-subjects, counterbalanced design with control (toy advertisement) and experimental (food advertisement) conditions. Subjects. A total of 37 school students (age: 11-13 years; weight status: 24 lean, 10 overweight, 3 obese). Measurements. Advertisement recall list, two food preference measures; the Leeds Food Preference Me… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
50
1
11

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
3
50
1
11
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, although a growing body of research demonstrates important differences in obese and lean subjects during food perception (Carnell et al 2012), future research should also address whether group differences exist in the coupling between subjects’ ratings of inferred food pleasantness and the activity of the ventral pallidum and OFC, as well as whether specific dimensions of pleasantness are differentially weighted in obesity and influence food-related decision making. In so doing, these findings might thus provide a neurobiological account for why obese children are more susceptible to food advertisements than their lean counterparts (Halford et al 2008b; Halford et al 2008a), and provide targets for interventions aimed at ameliorating their relative vulnerability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…For example, although a growing body of research demonstrates important differences in obese and lean subjects during food perception (Carnell et al 2012), future research should also address whether group differences exist in the coupling between subjects’ ratings of inferred food pleasantness and the activity of the ventral pallidum and OFC, as well as whether specific dimensions of pleasantness are differentially weighted in obesity and influence food-related decision making. In so doing, these findings might thus provide a neurobiological account for why obese children are more susceptible to food advertisements than their lean counterparts (Halford et al 2008b; Halford et al 2008a), and provide targets for interventions aimed at ameliorating their relative vulnerability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…External cues have an important influence over the amount of food consumed by hungry and satiated rodents (Weingarten, 1983; Petrovich et al, 2007). Appetitive conditioning has also been implicated in human feeding behavior; for example, cues provided in the media and the general obesogenic environment that pervades modern societies strongly influence eating choices and eating patterns in children (Jansen et al, 2003; Halford et al, 2008; Birch and Anzman-Frasca, 2011), adolescents (Scully et al, 2012), and adults (Scully et al, 2009), independently of body mass status (Ferriday and Brunstrom, 2011; Ziauddeen et al, 2012). The present findings demonstrate that subjects of any age can attribute incentive salience to food cues, thus placing them at risk for maladaptive behaviors, e.g., overeating in absence of metabolic need.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 The global obesity epidemic currently affects over 10% of the adult population worldwide. 4 Television advertising is known to be an important influence on children's preferences for food and drinks 5, 6, 7 (henceforth we include drinks in the term ‘foods'). Television advertising continues to be the most dominant promotional channel, and the food products promoted have an undesirable nutritional profile.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%