2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2009.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Children’s early mental number line: Logarithmic or decomposed linear?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

13
219
1
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(235 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
13
219
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Thereby, our results are hard to reconcile with the notion of an integrated holistic representation of numbers and measurement units in magnitude comparison tasks as suggested previously for two-digit numbers (e.g., Dehaene, Dupoux, & Mehler, 1990). Furthermore, the finding of such componential processing of physical quantities corresponds nicely with previous accounts of componential processing in arithmetic (e.g., as well as number line estimation (e.g., Moeller, Pixner, Kaufmann, & Nuerk, 2009 Second, our results not only generalize multi-symbol compatibility effects to units of measurement but also allow transfer of the string length congruity effect found for decimal fractions to measurement units (Huber et al, 2014b). Thus, not only the number of digits, but also the number of characters (i.e., digits plus letters indicating the scale units) seems to be processed and compared separately.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 75%
“…Thereby, our results are hard to reconcile with the notion of an integrated holistic representation of numbers and measurement units in magnitude comparison tasks as suggested previously for two-digit numbers (e.g., Dehaene, Dupoux, & Mehler, 1990). Furthermore, the finding of such componential processing of physical quantities corresponds nicely with previous accounts of componential processing in arithmetic (e.g., as well as number line estimation (e.g., Moeller, Pixner, Kaufmann, & Nuerk, 2009 Second, our results not only generalize multi-symbol compatibility effects to units of measurement but also allow transfer of the string length congruity effect found for decimal fractions to measurement units (Huber et al, 2014b). Thus, not only the number of digits, but also the number of characters (i.e., digits plus letters indicating the scale units) seems to be processed and compared separately.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 75%
“…This understanding is important for the number line task in which participants are asked to locate a number on a number line. Successful performance requires verbal understanding of phonologicalorthographic relationships related to the Arabic place value system, as well as usage of verbal strategies, thus highlighting the common verbal skills required for both reading and numerical skills (Moeller, Pixner, Kaufmann, & Nuerk, 2009;Peeters, Degrande, Ebersbach, Verschaffel, & Luwel, 2016).Reading and mathematics both involve executive functions, entangling the relationship between RD, MD and ADHD further due to the central role of executive functions in ADHD (Barkley, 1997). Another related shared risk factor can be processing speed, for example, Peterson et al (2017) explored the unique and shared risk factors for RD, MD and ADHD and found that slower processing speed was a shared cognitive risk factor.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To examine the two-linear model, we used the point that separates single-and two-digit numbers as the breakpoint on the 0-100 number line and the point that separates two-and three-digit numbers as the breakpoint on the 0-1000 number line. We followed the procedure used by Moeller (e.g., Moeller et al, 2009). As shown in Figs.…”
Section: Fit Of Two-linear Model and One-and Two-cycle Versions Of Prmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This law is believed to describe representations of numerical as well as physical magnitudes (Bank & Hill, 1974;Dehaene, 1997). One of the widely used tasks to examine how the human mind represents numbers is the number line estimation task, in which participants are asked to place a given number on a straight line anchored with numbers at the two ends (e.g., 0 on the left end and 10 or 100 on the right end; Dehaene, Izard, Spelke, & Pica, 2008;Ebersbach, Luwel, Frick, Onghena, & Verschaffel, 2008;Geary, Hoard, Nugent, & Byrd-Craven, 2008;Moeller, Pixner, Kaufmann, & Nuerk, 2009;Muldoon, Simms, Towse, Menzies, & Yue, 2011;Opfer, Siegler, & Young, 2011;Siegler & Booth, 2004;Siegler & Opfer, 2003;Slusser, Santiago, & Barth, 2013;Whyte & Bull, 2008;.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation