1978
DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1978.tb02386.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Children's Development and Use of Inferences About Intentions and Motives in Moral Judgment

Abstract: Summary. A sample of 42 children, age 5 to 7, were tested for their ability to give appropriate causal accounts of incidents and to consider intentions and motives in judging the characters involved in these incidents. Results indicated that children are able to consider intention before they develop the ability to consider motives in moral judgment. A comparison of the causal accounts and moral judgments showed that children can make the appropriate causal inferences before they are able to make use of these… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The remainder of the article is devoted to consideration of some of the specific issues that such a model might address. The discussion draws heavily from FlavelPs (1971,1974) speculations on different stage-related properties of cognitive development and interpersonal inference and studies (e.g., Bearison & Isaacs, 1975;Emler, 1978) of these properties in the moral sphere. In light of the work of Mischel and Mischel (1976), Brown and Herrnstein (197S), Kohlberg (1969), Leming (1978), Aronfreed (1976), and others, factors mediating various aspects of the moral judgment process are also briefly discussed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The remainder of the article is devoted to consideration of some of the specific issues that such a model might address. The discussion draws heavily from FlavelPs (1971,1974) speculations on different stage-related properties of cognitive development and interpersonal inference and studies (e.g., Bearison & Isaacs, 1975;Emler, 1978) of these properties in the moral sphere. In light of the work of Mischel and Mischel (1976), Brown and Herrnstein (197S), Kohlberg (1969), Leming (1978), Aronfreed (1976), and others, factors mediating various aspects of the moral judgment process are also briefly discussed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A multiplicity of skills come into play in the course of judging moral problems and dilemmas. Following Flavell (1971Flavell ( , 1974, Bearison andIsaacs (1975), andEmler (1978), these skills can be roughly categorized into four classes:…”
Section: Components Oj the Moral Judgment Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Failure to accept responsibility may also be observable in children. Emler (1978) argued that between the ages of 5 and 7, children can give appropriate causal accounts of incidents and the role of intention and motive when judging hypothetical situations. Attributional errors such as hostile attribution bias have also been identified in children and are considered to be functionally linked to aggression (Dodge, 1980).…”
Section: Deficient Affective Experiencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although motives become far more important than consequences for older children, there are occasions when the consequences of an action are so terrible that a consideration of motives is over-ridden. Elmer (1978) added another facet to the topic by drawing attention to different types of motives and to the possibility that people may be the cause of an event either intentionally or accidentally.…”
Section: Moral Reasoningmentioning
confidence: 99%