2009
DOI: 10.1080/13854040802427795
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Children's Color Trails Test 1 & 2: Test–Retest Reliability and Factorial Validity

Abstract: This investigation examined the test-retest reliability and the factorial validity of the Children's Color Trails Test 1 & 2 (CCTT) using two distinct and independent studies and their respective research samples. The reliability of the CCTT was evaluated in a study with 6-12-year-old children (n = 54) strictly selected and diagnosed with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder from an interventional protocol using test-retest coefficients at 8- and 16-week time intervals. Factorial validity was investigated … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
53
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
4
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The WISC-IV scores obtained for this sample were strongly correlated ( r =0.76, p <.001) with IQ scores obtained at 5 years on the Junior South African Individual Scale (Madge et al, 1981), which is normed for South African children. Four domains of EF were assessed: attentional control by the Stop Task (Rubia et al, 1998); cognitive flexibility by the Children’s Color Trails Test (CCTT) (Llorente et al, 2003) and the Verbal Fluency and Stroop (shift and interference) subtests of the Delis-Kaplan Executive Functioning System (DKEFS; Delis et al, 2001); goal-setting by the Tower of London, 2nd Edition (TOL; Culbertson and Zillmer, 2001); and working memory (WM) by the WISC-IV Digit Span Backwards. 1- and 2-back WM data (using letters) were available for a subset of the children (Diwadkar et al, 2013).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The WISC-IV scores obtained for this sample were strongly correlated ( r =0.76, p <.001) with IQ scores obtained at 5 years on the Junior South African Individual Scale (Madge et al, 1981), which is normed for South African children. Four domains of EF were assessed: attentional control by the Stop Task (Rubia et al, 1998); cognitive flexibility by the Children’s Color Trails Test (CCTT) (Llorente et al, 2003) and the Verbal Fluency and Stroop (shift and interference) subtests of the Delis-Kaplan Executive Functioning System (DKEFS; Delis et al, 2001); goal-setting by the Tower of London, 2nd Edition (TOL; Culbertson and Zillmer, 2001); and working memory (WM) by the WISC-IV Digit Span Backwards. 1- and 2-back WM data (using letters) were available for a subset of the children (Diwadkar et al, 2013).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Verbal Story Memory composite included the immediate recall of thematic units of Stories E and F from the Children’s Memory Scale (CMS) (Cohen, 1997), and delayed recognition of thematic units of Stories E and F from the CMS. The Self-Monitoring composite measure was derived from phonemic (letters L, B, and S) and semantic (animal category) fluency error scores (Strauss et al, 2006), the Auditory Verbal Learning Test total error score (Maj et al, 1993), time and rule violation scores from the Tower of London (Culbertson and Zillmer, 2001), error scores from the Children’s Color Trails Test (Llorente et al, 2003), and error scores from the Stroop Color-Word test. The Psychomotor Speed and Coordination composite included non-dominant peg insertion time from the Grooved Pegboard Test (Russell, 1993) and error scores from the Stroop Color-Word test (Golden and Freshwater, 2002).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Self-Monitoring and Regulation: Phonemic (letters L, B, and S) and semantic (animal category) fluency error scores (Strauss et al, 2006); AVLT total error score; time and rule violation scores from the Tower of London (ToL) (Culbertson and Zillmer, 2001); error scores from the Children’s Color Trails Test (CCTT) (Llorente et al, 2003); and error scores from the Stroop Color-Word test (SCWT) (Golden and Freshwater, 2002). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%