2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcci.2021.100446
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Children designing privacy warnings: Informing a set of design guidelines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The former group of mechanism are more often grounded upon self-regulation theories, such as Fogg's behavior model [52], Bandura's social cognitive theory of self-regulation [12], and the dual process theories of decision-making [48]. The latter group are often grounded upon theories related to different forms of knowledge construction, such as Piaget's theory on constructivism [18], Papert's constructionism theory [66], and cognitive learning theories [94]. Our analysis provides an initial observation of the relationship between different theories and the digital autonomy goals, and raises the question: whether there is an opportunity to explore and compare the different theoretically-guided approaches and examine how children's digital autonomy may be supported differently by approaches associated with a different theoretical grounding?…”
Section: Connecting Autonomy Design Mechanisms To Digital Autonomymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The former group of mechanism are more often grounded upon self-regulation theories, such as Fogg's behavior model [52], Bandura's social cognitive theory of self-regulation [12], and the dual process theories of decision-making [48]. The latter group are often grounded upon theories related to different forms of knowledge construction, such as Piaget's theory on constructivism [18], Papert's constructionism theory [66], and cognitive learning theories [94]. Our analysis provides an initial observation of the relationship between different theories and the digital autonomy goals, and raises the question: whether there is an opportunity to explore and compare the different theoretically-guided approaches and examine how children's digital autonomy may be supported differently by approaches associated with a different theoretical grounding?…”
Section: Connecting Autonomy Design Mechanisms To Digital Autonomymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Design features can directly affect children's understanding level of public safety signage. Although many factors affect children's understanding of signs, including cultural background (Ben & Shinar, 2018;Hurlbert & Ling, 2007) school education (Zou & Chen, 2020;Alonso et al, 2018), family education (Dempsey et al, 2022), social intervention (Hall et al, 2017;Thomson, 2006), etc. However, for children, the impact of low understanding caused by certain cognitive development characteristics cannot be eliminated through intervention.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%