2012
DOI: 10.1017/s1537592712000746
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Children and War: How “Soft” Research Can Answer the Hard Questions in Political Science

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although not all reviewers of Dallaire’s book make this criticism (e.g. Blattman, 2012; Dupuy, 2011), many scholars dispute the accuracy of this perception of child soldiers more broadly and note its cultural bias. For example, writing about constructions of child soldiers in popular Western media, Denov (2012: 281) states that they are ‘frequently constructed within a framework of extremes (as either extreme victims, extreme perpetrators or extreme heroes), [but] in reality, the lives of these children fall within the grey, ambiguous and paradoxical zones of each’.…”
Section: The Specificity Of the Visualmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although not all reviewers of Dallaire’s book make this criticism (e.g. Blattman, 2012; Dupuy, 2011), many scholars dispute the accuracy of this perception of child soldiers more broadly and note its cultural bias. For example, writing about constructions of child soldiers in popular Western media, Denov (2012: 281) states that they are ‘frequently constructed within a framework of extremes (as either extreme victims, extreme perpetrators or extreme heroes), [but] in reality, the lives of these children fall within the grey, ambiguous and paradoxical zones of each’.…”
Section: The Specificity Of the Visualmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Blattman offers an additional critique of cultural bias, noting the starkness of the contrast Dallaire draws between his own training as a cadet in the Canadian army and the recruitment and training of child soldiers. Although Blattman (2012) acknowledges the ‘huge difference’ between these, he writes that ‘cadet camps, even Canadian ones, are first and foremost institutions aimed at training, recruiting and, inescapably, indoctrinating children who, by Dallaire’s own account, are more susceptible to influence and the manipulation of adults’ (pp. 407–408).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perhaps the greatest interest in the violence/group/socialization nexus has come from those studying child soldiers (Gates & Reich, 2010; Blattman, 2012). This is not surprising, as a core finding from the classic socialization literature is that children are more susceptible than adults to socialization (Draper, 1974; Blattman, 2007).…”
Section: Socialization and Violence: State Of The Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such cases, the degree to which an armed group enlists children also will be influenced by ‘the characteristics of the accessibility of recruits: the number of usable children vs. adults in the area; the ease of capturing a child compared to an adult; the existence of exceptionally good “fishing grounds” such as refugee camps or secondary schools; and so on’ (Andvig & Gates, 2010: 90). Under such conditions the labor supply of children is flatter than that of adults, raising the demand for child soldiers (Andvig & Gates, 2010; Blattman, 2012).…”
Section: Forced Recruitmentmentioning
confidence: 99%