“…A different tradition based on social sciences, has been most frequently dedicated to macrolevel research, receiving contributions from many disciplines, including the sociological tradition studying childhood as a social phenomenon (Qvortrup, ), and the tradition of the social indicators movement (Bauer, ; Casas, ), frequently aiming to monitor the “state of children” in large populations. According to Ben‐Arieh (), this confluence of social disciplines have given birth to what is currently known as “the child indicators movement.” The same author points to five major global trends that have contributed to this movement: - The recognition of children's rights at international level, particularly after the adoption of the United Nations Convention.
- The “new” sociology of childhood (Gaitán, ).
- The ecology of child development (Bronfenbrenner & Morris, ).
- New methodological perspectives in child studies: valuing the subjective viewpoints of child participants, accepting children as a unit of observation, and systematically collecting child statistics in certain countries.
- The desire to improve policy decisions by collecting and disseminating better data on all areas of child and adolescent life.
…”