2019
DOI: 10.1093/pch/pxz145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Childhood unintentional injury: The impact of family income, education level, occupation status, and other measures of socioeconomic status. A systematic review

Abstract: Introduction Unintentional injuries represent a substantial public health burden among children and adolescents, and previous evidence suggests that there are disparities in injury by socioeconomic status (SES). This paper reports on a systematic review of literature on injury rates among children and adolescents by measures of SES. Methods A systematic literature search was conducted using six electronic databases: MEDLINE, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with evidence from systematic reviews on risk factors for TDIs, 30,31 the results also indicate that certain population sub-groups might be at greater risk of experiencing TDIs. Male adolescents and those living in families with low SEP had greater odds of having TDIs than their corresponding counterparts.…”
Section: Re Sultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Consistent with evidence from systematic reviews on risk factors for TDIs, 30,31 the results also indicate that certain population sub-groups might be at greater risk of experiencing TDIs. Male adolescents and those living in families with low SEP had greater odds of having TDIs than their corresponding counterparts.…”
Section: Re Sultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Falls are the most common unintentional injuries that occur in a community. [11][12][13] This study reports 9.1% incidence of unintentional fall injuries in Tamil Nadu which is higher than the study done by Ashish Pathak 14 in Madhya Pradesh and Gupta S 15 in Nepal which showed 7.7% and 5.2% of incidence this might be due to geographical variation. In a study by Mohan et al 16 in Haryana revealed more incidence of unintentional fall injuries which might be due to the selection of participants boys were more than girls.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…The number of publications on outdoor play in Canada increased considerably since the publication of the Position Statement on Active Outdoor Play Many of the reviews identified in this scoping review [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42] focussed primarily on physical health outcomes. Several [30][31][32][33][34][35][36]40 also explored the social and environmental health benefits of outdoor play for children and youth; this is encouraging given the importance of building a connection to the land at a young age for fostering lifelong environmental stewardship and promoting action to mitigate climate change. 43,44 Given the relative novelty of outdoor play research in Canada, it is also not surprising that cross-sectional studies were the most common study design as these studies are a crucial first step in understanding the state of outdoor play across Canada.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%