2020
DOI: 10.1186/s12966-019-0899-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Childhood fussy/picky eating behaviours: a systematic review and synthesis of qualitative studies

Abstract: Fussy/picky eating behaviours are common across childhood. Recent reviews of the fussy eating literature focus on quantitative research and do not adequately account for families' subjective experiences, perceptions and practices. This review aims to synthesise the increasing volume of qualitative work on fussy eating. A systematic search of relevant databases was carried out. Studies were included if they were qualitative, published since 2008, with a primary focus on families' experiences, perceptions and pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
76
1
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
76
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The literature suggests that childcare educators adjust their feeding practices in response to child food refusal (verbal and non-verbal), using controlling feeding practices (coercion, threats, insistence and spoon-feeding) [42,54] and the provision of alternatives (rather than repeated exposure of the target food) [52] appears to be common practice. When reflecting on the efficacy of a childcare educator to respond to child food refusal, Wolstenholme et al (2020) [67] described a carer's beliefs about attributions for fussy eating behaviour and hunger regulation to be highly influential. Carers who are able to determine if food refusal is due to sensory sensitivity or neophobia and who support self-regulation are less likely to regard children as fussy eaters and more likely to utilise responsive child feeding practices [67].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The literature suggests that childcare educators adjust their feeding practices in response to child food refusal (verbal and non-verbal), using controlling feeding practices (coercion, threats, insistence and spoon-feeding) [42,54] and the provision of alternatives (rather than repeated exposure of the target food) [52] appears to be common practice. When reflecting on the efficacy of a childcare educator to respond to child food refusal, Wolstenholme et al (2020) [67] described a carer's beliefs about attributions for fussy eating behaviour and hunger regulation to be highly influential. Carers who are able to determine if food refusal is due to sensory sensitivity or neophobia and who support self-regulation are less likely to regard children as fussy eaters and more likely to utilise responsive child feeding practices [67].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When reflecting on the efficacy of a childcare educator to respond to child food refusal, Wolstenholme et al (2020) [67] described a carer's beliefs about attributions for fussy eating behaviour and hunger regulation to be highly influential. Carers who are able to determine if food refusal is due to sensory sensitivity or neophobia and who support self-regulation are less likely to regard children as fussy eaters and more likely to utilise responsive child feeding practices [67]. These authors also described relational efficacy (beliefs and confidence in another person's estimation of one's own ability) as important as self-efficacy (beliefs and confidence in one's own ability) when upskilling carers about child feeding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Webber et al showed that parents pressure their child to eat in response to concerns about inadequate intakes or because they perceive their child as too thin [43]. A review of qualitative studies also suggested that parental pressure to eat is associated with fussy eating in children, an association that is likely to be bi-directional [44].…”
Section: Parental Pressure To Eatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study provides a unique insight into parents' concerns about fussy eating in toddlers, through an analysis of support seeking questions posted on the social media platform Reddit. Although previous studies have examined parents' perceptions and management of fussy eating behaviour (Wolstenholme et al, 2020), this is the first study to analyse parents' presentations of fussy eating using an online discussion forum. As such, this study revealed new insights into parents' feeding concerns they may not have felt comfortable articulating else-…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Original posts were retained for analysis as this study was focused on the support seeking practices of parents presenting with fussy eating concerns, yielding 329 posts, which were exported to Microsoft Excel for further refinement (Figure 1). Of these posts, 130 were related to fussy eating based on existing literature definitions of common food fussiness behaviours (e.g., food refusal and limited liked foods; Taylor et al, 2015;Wolstenholme et al, 2020). Data retrieved included post date and time, user pseudonym and the original post title and body.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%