2007
DOI: 10.1159/000101502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Childhood Eating and Weight in Eating Disorders: A Multi-Centre European Study of Affected Women and Their Unaffected Sisters

Abstract: Background: Previous studies have suggested that childhood eating and weight problems may be risk factors for eating disorders. Robust evidence is still lacking. Aims: To investigate whether childhood eating and weight problems increase the risk of eating disorders in affected women compared to their unaffected sisters. Methods: Women (150) with anorexia (AN) or bulimia nervosa (BN) recruited from clinical and community samples were compared to their unaffected sister closest in age on maternal reports of chil… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
33
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…A comparison to remission rates of other studies is problematic and probably misleading, as results vary broadly according to outcome definitions, samples of patients and length of follow-up [29, 30]. That we could not identify predictors of outcome in bulimia nervosa [31] is in line with previous studies, but may also be due to not having included all possibly relevant aspects [32]. The best predictor of outcome seems to be an early treatment response [33], a finding that is unspecific and also found in other patient groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…A comparison to remission rates of other studies is problematic and probably misleading, as results vary broadly according to outcome definitions, samples of patients and length of follow-up [29, 30]. That we could not identify predictors of outcome in bulimia nervosa [31] is in line with previous studies, but may also be due to not having included all possibly relevant aspects [32]. The best predictor of outcome seems to be an early treatment response [33], a finding that is unspecific and also found in other patient groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Given high diagnostic crossover [32], women were categorized into mutually exclusive diagnostic groups. Women who only met one diagnosis were assigned to that diagnostic group; for those who had more than one diagnosis over their lifetime a hierarchical approach was used: full diagnoses (AN, BN, BED) trumped OSFED subtypes, BED trumped BN, and BN trumped AN, in accordance to our and others’ previous studies [19, 33], and evidence that diagnostic crossover over the lifetime in ED and in this sample occurs most commonly from restrictive type disorders (anorexia nervosa – restrictive (AN-R)) to binge and/or binge-purge disorders [19, 32]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aus den Publikationen, die aus den 5 Schwerpunktthemen hervorgegangen sind werden 5 wichtige Publikationen ausgewählt, aus den weiteren 6 Themen 2. Die meisten der 284 Publikationen erscheinen zu 5 Themen: Essstörungen (n = 34) [20][21][22][23][24], gefolgt von Forensik (n = 23) [25][26][27][28][29], Neuropädiatrie (n = 22) [30][31][32][33], Psychosen und Prodrome (n = 19) [34][35][36][37][38] und Suizidalität (n = 17) [39][40][41][42][43]. Diese 5 Themen ergaben 115 Publikationen, was etwa 41 % der Artikel ausmacht.…”
Section: Online Supplement (Link)unclassified