The aim of this study was to compare two different methods, tidal breathing (TB) and single-breath (SB), for measuring fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) in infants.FENO was measured in 71 infants with either recurrent wheeze (n=32), recurrent cough (n=16) or no symptoms (healthy, n=23) using both methods. For TB measurements five breaths were collected into a gas sampling bag (off-line reservoir sampling). The SB method was modified from the raised volume rapid thoracoabdominal technique. Agreement between the two methods was investigated and both methods were used to compare FENO in infants with and without symptoms.Flow dependence of SB FENO was demonstrated using two expiratory flows (11 and 40 mL?s -1 ). There was a moderate correlation (r=0.60) but poor agreement between levels using the TB and SB methods. A significant difference in FENO between healthy children and children with wheeze was found using the SB but not the TB method.Due to lower expiratory flow and reduced nasal nitric oxide contamination the singlebreath technique may be more sensitive than the tidal breathing method for detecting differences in exhaled nitric oxide between infants with and without respiratory symptoms. BARALDI et al. [4] showed that FENO measurements were raised in acutely wheezing infants and reduced to normal after inhaled steroid treatment, while the current authors have previously reported increased FENO in clinically stable infants with a history of wheeze [5]. Conversely, RATJEN et al. [6] reported that FENO was reduced in infants who presented with first-time wheezy bronchitis. These findings suggest that FENO may be able to differentiate between viralinduced and recurrent wheezing in infants.In infants FENO has been measured during tidal breathing (TB) [4,6,7] as well as using a modified single breath (SB) technique [5]. As infants are unable to actively cooperate with breath collections TB measurements seem to offer the simplest way to measure FENO in this age group. However, various important methodological issues, such as expiratory flow and nasal NO contamination, cannot be controlled during TB. The SB method controls for flow and excludes nasal NO contamination, however, it requires the child to be sedated and can only be performed with specialised equipment. The aim of the present study was to compare FENO in wheezy and healthy infants using both TB and SB methods. The current authors hypothesised that there would be a poor agreement but a good correlation between levels collected using the two methods. Furthermore, since most populations of wheezy infants are heterogenous and only a proportion are likely to have asthma, the authors hypothesised that, due to lower expiratory flows and reduced nasal NO contamination with the SB technique, it would be more sensitive than the TB method to detect a group mean shift in FENO.
Methods
Subjects and protocolA total of 23 healthy and 32 recurrent wheezy infants had FENO measured using both TB and SB techniques. Infants were classified as recurrent whee...