Childhood antecedents of Agreeableness: A longitudinal study from preschool to late adolescence

Bårdstu, Silje; Karevold, Evalill; Soest, Tilmann von

doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2016.10.007

Cited by 17 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 100 publications

(115 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, it warrants attention that some inconsistent findings have emerged in terms of significance and magnitude. For example, Baardstu et al (2017) found no significant longitudinal associations between positive parenting and self-control over the course of early adolescence. Parents who use negative parenting strategies are likely to deprive youths of opportunities to figure out self-control strategies independently (Grolnick, McMenamy, & Kurowski, 1999), provide youths with little or no guidance to self-regulate when needed (Baumrind, 1991), monitor and discipline youths' undesirable behavior inconsistently or ineffectively (Gottfredson & Hirschi, 1990), and create a stressful family environment that jeopardizes children's internalization of social rules (Kochanska, Aksan, & Koenig, 1995;Silverman & Ragusa, 1990).…”

Section: The Influence Of Parenting On Self-controlmentioning

confidence: 88%

Section: The Association Between Parenting and Self-controlmentioning

confidence: 88%

“…However, studies extending this work to adolescence yield mixed findings. Whereas some studies have reported robust cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between parenting and self-control throughout adolescence (Hay, 2001;Hope, Grasmick, & Pointon, 2003;Özdemir, Vazsonyi, & Çok, 2013;Vazsonyi & Belliston, 2007), others have reported only significant concurrent associations (Baardstu, Karevold, & von Soest, 2017;Craig, 2016;Moilanen, Rasmussen, & Padilla-Walker, 2015;Pallini et al, 2018). Moreover, some studies have found significant associations for some parenting dimensions but not others Vazsonyi, Jiskrova, Ksinan, & Blatny, 2016).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Parenting and Self-Control Across Early to Late Adolescence: A Three-Level Meta-Analysis

Willems

Stok

et al. 2019

Perspect Psychol Sci

114

106

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Self-control plays a significant role in positive youth development. Although numerous self-control challenges occur during adolescence, some adolescents control themselves better than others. Parenting is considered a critical factor that distinguishes adolescents with good self-control from those with poor self-control, but existing findings are inconsistent. This meta-analysis summarizes the overall relationship between parenting and self-control among adolescents aged 10 to 22 years. The analysis includes 191 articles reporting 1,540 effect sizes ( N = 164,459). The results show that parenting is associated with adolescents’ self-control both concurrently ( r = .204, p < .001) and longitudinally ( r = .157, p < .001). Longitudinal studies also reveal that adolescents’ self-control influences subsequent parenting ( r = .155, p < .001). Moderator analyses show that the effect sizes are largely invariant across cultures, ethnicities, age of adolescents, and parent and youth gender. Our results point to the importance of parenting in individual differences in adolescent self-control and vice versa.

show abstract

Section: The Influence Of Parenting On Self-controlmentioning

confidence: 88%

Section: The Association Between Parenting and Self-controlmentioning

confidence: 88%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Parenting and Self-Control Across Early to Late Adolescence: A Three-Level Meta-Analysis

Willems

Stok

et al. 2019

Perspect Psychol Sci

114

106

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The same results were found when examining links between early levels of parenting (when the child was 15 years old) and later child personality at age 17. Despite the positive findings in the aforementioned studies, Baardstu et al (2017) found non-significant associations between parental warmth measured when children were 8.5, and child agreeableness measured at age 16.5. As for the influence of child's personality on parenting, it was found that child's Big Five personality traits, which were measured at age 11, predicted parental warmth, overreaction, and psychological control 5 years later (Egberts et al, 2015).…”

Section: Existing Studies On the Associations Between Parenting And Child Big Five Personality Traitsmentioning

confidence: 56%

Longitudinal Associations Between Parenting and Child Big Five Personality Traits

Ayoub

Zhang

Göllner

et al. 2021

Collabra: Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The goal of this research was to explore the relationships between four parenting dimensions (academic involvement, structure, cultural stimulation, and goals) and child personality development. Many theories, such as social learning, attachment theory, and the psychological resources principle assume that parenting practices influence child personality development. Most of past research on the associations between parenting and child Big Five traits specifically has used cross-sectional data. The few longitudinal studies that examined these associations found small relations between parenting and child personality. We extended this research by examining the long-term relations between four underexplored parenting dimensions and child Big Five personality traits using bivariate latent growth models in a large longitudinal dataset (N = 3,880). Results from growth models revealed a preponderance of null relations between these parenting measures and child personality, especially between changes in parenting and changes in child personality. In general, the observed associations between parenting and child Big Five personality were comparable in magnitude to the association between factors such as SES and birth order, and child personality—that is, small. The small associations between environmental factors and personality suggest that personality development in childhood and adolescence may be driven by multiple factors, each of which makes a small contribution.

show abstract

“…Moreover, parents punish and excessively constrain children's freedom. Researchers generally regard overprotection and rejection as negative parenting modes [17,18].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effects of Parenting Mode on Student Adaptability: The Mediating Effect of Irrational Beliefs

Hua

Hongwang

Yujian

et al. 2022

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Backgrounds: When facing the new growth field of university, some college students will quickly form good university adaptation, while others will have maladaptation behavior. The students’ adaptations of to the growth environment in universities and smooth transition to adulthood are the important topics in recent years. Methods：Present study introduces irrational beliefs to investigate the effects of parenting mode on maladaptation of university students. The questionnaires based on simplified parenting mode (Chinese), irrational belief and adaptability were administered in a survey of 510 university students in Zhanjiang on October, 2021, by using the random sampling method. Parenting mode was used as the independent variable, while the emotionally warm, overprotective and rejecting types were used as the indices. Further, the irrational beliefs including summary comments, awful beliefs and low tolerance to setbacks as well as maladaptation were included in the mediation model for analysis.Results: The results showed that emotionally warm parenting mode was negatively correlated with summary comments (r = -0.334), awful beliefs (r = -0.108) and low tolerance to setbacks (r = -0.153). The rejection parenting mode was negatively related with absolute requirements (r = -0.143), and learning motivation (r = -0.157), interpersonal adaptation (r = -0.283) and physical and psychological adjustment(r=-0.083). Overprotection was negatively correlated with absolute requirements (r = -0.042) and interpersonal adaptation (r = -0.042). The mediating effect of irrational beliefs (low tolerance to setbacks, awful beliefs and absolute requirements), the lower and upper limits of Bootstrap confidence interval were 0.141 and 0.532, respectively, excluding 0, which indicated that the mediating effect is true. Conclusion: Through the analysis of the data, this study believes that irrational beliefs such as low tolerance to setbacks, awful beliefs and absolute requirements mediate the effects on school adjustment. Parenting mode can influence adaptability of university students. Emotionally warm parents strengthen the adaptability of university students. By contrast, negative parenting modes such as overprotection and rejection inculcate irrational beliefs, resulting in maladaptation of university students.

show abstract

Childhood antecedents of Agreeableness: A longitudinal study from preschool to late adolescence

Cited by 17 publications

References 100 publications

Parenting and Self-Control Across Early to Late Adolescence: A Three-Level Meta-Analysis

Parenting and Self-Control Across Early to Late Adolescence: A Three-Level Meta-Analysis

Longitudinal Associations Between Parenting and Child Big Five Personality Traits

Effects of Parenting Mode on Student Adaptability: The Mediating Effect of Irrational Beliefs

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About