The Palgrave Handbook of Australian and New Zealand Criminology, Crime and Justice 2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-55747-2_28
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Child Witnesses in the Criminal Courts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While it may seem surprising to outsiders that such a radical scheme meets with such a positive response, the warm reaction of these lawyers is entirely of a piece with previous research findings (Plotnikoff and Woolfson, 2006; Hanna et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…While it may seem surprising to outsiders that such a radical scheme meets with such a positive response, the warm reaction of these lawyers is entirely of a piece with previous research findings (Plotnikoff and Woolfson, 2006; Hanna et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…At trial, intermediaries, like interpreters, are sworn as officers of the court and are not witnesses (Plotnikoff and Woolfson, 2012: 31; forthcoming, 2015; Hanna et al, 2010). They have a strict obligation of neutrality, are available to assist either side and are not liable to be examined themselves except in extraordinary circumstances.…”
Section: Intermediaries In England and Wales: An Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further delays often occur before children are questioned or cross-examined in court. Delays between initial referral and courtroom testimony reportedly range from approximately 11 (United Kingdom; Plotnikoff & Woolfson, 1995 ) or 15 (New Zealand; Hanna, Davies, Henderson, Crothers, & Rotherham, 2010 ) months, to up to 2 years (United States; Quas & Sumaroka, 2011 ). It is important, therefore, to ask what happens to children's recall of their experiences over extended periods of time.…”
Section: Cwid and Eyewitness Testimonymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Communication assistance in NZ, like its counterpart in England and Wales, arose out of concern for the treatment of and evidence given by vulnerable witnesses in the adult jurisdiction, especially child witnesses in sexual offence cases (for a discussion of these concerns see, for example, Davies et al, 2011; Hanna et al, 2010; Ministry of Justice, 2010; New Zealand Law Commission, 1996, 2012). The first NZ court case to utilise a communication assistant was R v Hetherington [2015] NZCA 248) (with the original trial decision being in 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%