2013
DOI: 10.1080/15548732.2013.766822
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Child Welfare Birth Match: Timely Use of Child Welfare Administrative Data to Protect Newborns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A narrower approach to early detection is a birth match system, which identifies newborn children of parents with serious histories of child abuse or neglect perpetration or who have had their parental rights involuntarily terminated to a previous child (Shaw, Barth, Mattingly, Ayer, & Berry, 2013), thereby allowing states to initiate an assessment of the newborn child’s safety and to offer preventive services. By only using a parent’s prior confirmed behavior, birth match systems are narrowly targeted and more transparent than the complex algorithms used in PRM.…”
Section: Opportunities For Foster Care Reform Through Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A narrower approach to early detection is a birth match system, which identifies newborn children of parents with serious histories of child abuse or neglect perpetration or who have had their parental rights involuntarily terminated to a previous child (Shaw, Barth, Mattingly, Ayer, & Berry, 2013), thereby allowing states to initiate an assessment of the newborn child’s safety and to offer preventive services. By only using a parent’s prior confirmed behavior, birth match systems are narrowly targeted and more transparent than the complex algorithms used in PRM.…”
Section: Opportunities For Foster Care Reform Through Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also have an ongoing need for linked data and collaboration across multiple programs for multiple purposes including surveillance, evaluation of existing and new policies, planning and implementation of community-level violence prevention and child maltreatment prevention strategies, and evaluation of services. The CDC could certainly better leverage funding to states for the accumulation of birth records—under the National Vital Records Program—by asking states to link those data to CWS data to generate intervention opportunities to assist CWS-involved families who are having newborns (Shaw et al 2013). We could also learn much more about service needs, usual care in child welfare, and preventive services through investments in cross-systems data exchanges such as the Comprehensive Child Welfare Information System (CCWIS) and efforts to enhance and modernize existing data systems to support research, business, practice, and client data needs (Harrison et al 2018).…”
Section: Summary and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 It is possible that the ethical cost of not using accurate predictive models is greater than any ethical cost attendant to instituting such models. Creating such a program in the United States is not utterly without precedent, 7 but it would represent a paradigmatic change in how we see the role of the state in protecting children and supporting families, supplementing the current hotline-gated system with an empirically sound and timely, preventive system. The question is, "Do we want to do it?"…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%