For letter-writing as representation of the self see R. Earle, Epistolary Selves: Letters and Letter-Writing, 1600-1945 (Aldershot, 1999, especially contributions by Earle, Whyman, and Ditz; and for letters as a tool of education and socialisation see S. Whyman, The Pen and the People: English Letter Writers, 1660-1800 (Oxford, 2009 All quotations from seventeenth-and eighteenth-century letters reproduced here, maintain the spelling and grammar of the original source.
3It has largely been through the careful reading of previously unstudied letters, diaries and autobiographies written by women (as well as the study of their more self-consciously literary outputs such as novels, plays and poems) that we can begin at least to hear the lost voices of women in the past. 5 Here, it is shown that letter-writing can offer insights into a range of relationships with writing. Correspondence is also revealing of who women wrote to: men, other women, groups of like-minded others, specific intellectual confidants or supportive family contacts. Moreover, as an artefact of human relationships, the letter places the impulse to read, think and write firmly within its social, political and cultural context. This article proposes an interpretation of intellectual life that can more accurately be described as the 'life of the mind'. 6 Used most famously by Hannah Arendt, in her exploration of the 'activity of thinking', the phrase is employed here to emphasise the experience of thinking life as well as the tangible textual outcomes of thought. 7 In Arendt's discussion of the life of the mind, she identifies 'the habit of examining whatever happens to come to pass or to attract attention, regardless of results and specific content,' as a defining feature. 8 This inclusive approach to human thought is helpful when considering women's epistolary writing in this period because it took such 5