1988
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4757-9301-7_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Child Neuropsychological Assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Neuropsychological organization in children remains unclear at present, but a variety of sources (cf. Hynd & Willis, 1988;Tramontana & Hooper, 1988;Welsh & Pennington, 1988) suggest important potential differences in brain-behavior relationships for children versus adults. Basing assessments of children on scaled-down versions of adult assessment tools is, at best, a tenuous practice.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Neuropsychological organization in children remains unclear at present, but a variety of sources (cf. Hynd & Willis, 1988;Tramontana & Hooper, 1988;Welsh & Pennington, 1988) suggest important potential differences in brain-behavior relationships for children versus adults. Basing assessments of children on scaled-down versions of adult assessment tools is, at best, a tenuous practice.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It was and still is popular (Hynd, Snow & Becker,1986;Rabin, Barr & Burton, 2005Akhutina & Melikyan, 2012). However, it was met with some criticism from American and Russian neuropsychologists (Akhutina & Tsvetkova, 1983 on adult version;Hynd et al, 1986;Tramontana & Hooper, 1988 on the children revision). Following Luria's pioneer work, Das and colleagues (see e.g., Das, Kar & Parrila, 1996) conceptualized Planning as one of the major cognitive processes in the PASS (Planning, Attention, Simultaneous, and Successive processing) theory of intelligence.…”
Section: Neuropsychological Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the approach has a number of shortcomings. As some leading Russian and foreign neuropsychologists point out, the results of the diagnostics -expert estimates -are highly dependent on subjective factors: clinical experience, qualification, the theoretical approach of the expert and his/her individual style of conducting neuropsychological assessment (for a review, see [7][8][9]). Consequently, the results of the assessments obtained by different neuropsychologists are often incompatible; they do not have sufficient reliability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%