2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.09.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Child Mouthing of Feces and Fomites and Animal Contact are Associated with Diarrhea and Impaired Growth Among Young Children in the Democratic Republic of the Congo: A Prospective Cohort Study (REDUCE Program)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…36,57 The association identified in our present study is likely because feces on the household compound contributed to fecal contamination of drinking water sources that are often illegal connections to the municipal water supply [58][59][60][61] and contributed to pediatric exposure to fecal pathogens through child mouthing behaviors. [13][14][15][16] High E. coli (> 100 CFU/100 mL) in source water was a significant risk factor for diarrhea in young children in this study. This finding are also consistent with previous studies that have found unimproved and unprotected water sources, which are more prone to fecal contamination, to be associated with pediatric diarrhea.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…36,57 The association identified in our present study is likely because feces on the household compound contributed to fecal contamination of drinking water sources that are often illegal connections to the municipal water supply [58][59][60][61] and contributed to pediatric exposure to fecal pathogens through child mouthing behaviors. [13][14][15][16] High E. coli (> 100 CFU/100 mL) in source water was a significant risk factor for diarrhea in young children in this study. This finding are also consistent with previous studies that have found unimproved and unprotected water sources, which are more prone to fecal contamination, to be associated with pediatric diarrhea.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…[9][10][11][12] Geophagy, the consumption of soil, dirt, or mud, and child mouthing of feces and fomites have been associated with environmental enteropathy, diarrhea, and growth faltering in young children. [13][14][15][16][17] Previous studies have also identified unimproved drinking water sources, poor water storage practices, not treating drinking water in the home, lack of caregiver handwashing with soap, lack of caregiver awareness of hygiene practices,…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21,22 Spot checks are another widely used observational method used for assessing a predetermined list of conditions. [23][24][25][26][27] Spot checks can be used to evaluate inadequate environmental conditions surrounding infants, such as the absence of sanitation facilities, 28 poor household cleanliness (presence of feces on the floor, stagnant wastewater), 23,[28][29][30] and hand cleanliness, 27,31 all of which are associated with enteric outcomes. Hour-to-hour spot check results can estimate the short-term variability of certain behaviors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main pathways through which exposure to animal contamination can harm child nutritional status are through the transmission of zoonotic pathogens that cause diarrhea, through parasitic infections such as worms, and through a subclinical condition known as environmental enteric dysfunction (EED), which triggers low-level inflammation and poor nutrient absorption [ 7 , 9 , 10 ]. Thus, increased ownership of animals may be associated with increased exposure to fecal matter [ 11 ] which has been associated with a higher prevalence of child growth faltering [ 10 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent research has attempted to address these concerns of animal ownership and contamination by conducting observational, experimental, and qualitative studies. Some methods to explore these relationships have included “spot checks” of cleanliness around a household [ 11 ]; direct observations of infants and young children to document instances of exposure to contamination [ 13 , 14 ]; direct measurement of pathogens and their transmission to humans, animals, and objects [ 14 – 17 ]; measurement of biomarkers of EED [ 18 ]; randomized trials to limit exposure to contamination [ 19 – 21 ]; description of the factors predicting chicken corralling practices by households [ 22 ]; qualitative research to understand perceptions surrounding the adoption of animal corrals [ 23 , 24 ]; and a combination of these methods [ 14 , 25 ]. However, we are not aware of any studies that quantitatively describe the chicken management practices used by households and then assess them qualitatively for ground-truthing purposes, especially in the context of Ethiopia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%