2010
DOI: 10.1080/10888431003623504
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Child Miscues and Parental Feedback During Shared Alphabet Book Reading and Relations With Child Literacy Skills

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…their rate of successful naming), but not which words they produced. The impact of index words in literacy acquisition is also not clear, since children often fail to connect the spelling, sounds, and meanings of words, even when explicitly coached by their parents using alphabet books (Davis, Evans, & Reynolds, 2010). However, there is abundant evidence that alphabet books do promote alphabet learning (e.g.…”
Section: Index Words In Literacy Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…their rate of successful naming), but not which words they produced. The impact of index words in literacy acquisition is also not clear, since children often fail to connect the spelling, sounds, and meanings of words, even when explicitly coached by their parents using alphabet books (Davis, Evans, & Reynolds, 2010). However, there is abundant evidence that alphabet books do promote alphabet learning (e.g.…”
Section: Index Words In Literacy Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, shared reading of informational texts results in more cognitively challenging talk between adults and children (e.g. Price et al., 2012), and reading alphabet books can elicit a higher rate of phonological awareness and print concept behaviour by parents (Davis et al., 2010; Stadler and McEvoy, 2004). Moschovaki and Meadows (2005) found that the use of the more familiar narrative text type in an information book resulted in more predictive and analytic comments by children.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, they do so with the intent of fostering alphabetic knowledge (Nowak & Evans, 2013). Despite this, studies using paper alphabet books are rare (for exceptions, see Brabham, Murray, & Bowden, 2006;Davis, Evans, & Reynolds, 2010;Lachner, Zevenbergen, & Zevenbergen, 2008;Murray, Stahl, & Ivey, 1996;Smolkin & Yaden, 1992;Stadler & McEvoy, 2003), and only one study of digital alphabet books (Willoughby, Evans, & Nowak, 2015) has been identified by the present authors. Therefore, research on alphabet books and alphabet eBooks is much needed.…”
Section: Alphabet Booksmentioning
confidence: 89%