Child Interviewing in Legal Cases : A European Perspective

Torma, Judit

doi:10.46941/2021.e2.92-105

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…At the same time, he emphasized the problem of achieving the latter, although he noted that, despite all this, judging institutions and talking about their success or failure was a kind of attempt to measure this effectiveness (Storing, 1965). From today's perspective, measurement tools and indicators have been significantly refined, and when we talk about the effectiveness of governance and policy implementation/administration, there are various indices, normative principles, and tools to evaluate them one example of which is OCED SIGMA/PUMA (Torma, 2011).…”

Section: Public Administration Evolution From the Classical Type To M...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Evolution of the Thoughts of Public Administration and Its Understanding Following the Perspectives of Political Science, Management and Law

Khuroshvili

2023

IAJAS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article aims to understand, analyze, and explain the evolution of the understanding of public administration from the perspectives of political science, management and law. The paper begins to study public administration from its classical type, where three perspectives of it are studied synthetically, as well as its potential as an independent administrative science. The article answers why and how the field is considered, even at the level of defining the concept of public administration and how it differs from management, law and political science. Additionally, the work demonstrates the visions expressed by such authors as Max Weber, Woodrow Wilson, Frank Goodnow, Leonard White, Herbert A. Simon, Luther Gulick and Dwight Waldo.

show abstract

Section: Public Administration Evolution From the Classical Type To M...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Evolution of the Thoughts of Public Administration and Its Understanding Following the Perspectives of Political Science, Management and Law

Khuroshvili

2023

IAJAS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…38 A different issue lies in questionings that take place during investigations, which the police or prosecutors usually perform. On the topic, see Torma (2021): 92-105. 39 When the defendant is present, it 'must be heard' by the judge (Articles 31 § § 5 and 4; and 33 § 4 of the d.P.R.).…”

Section: Technical Affective and Psychological Assistancementioning

confidence: 99%

Protecting juvenile defendants in the trial and from the trial: special safeguards in EU and Italian regulations

Zampini

2023

10.14746/rpeis

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Both the Directive 2016/800/EU and the Italian national law on juvenile criminal trial (presidential decree no. 448/1988) aim to provide specific safeguards for young suspects and defendants to protect their fragile and still-developing personality, and to ensure that any crime allegedly committed by the minor is an isolated incident in their past. These safeguards are required throughout criminal proceedings, especially during the trial stage, which can be confusing and overwhelming for a juvenile and may seriously impact their development. The trial phase – along with the precautionary limitation of personal freedom – seems to be the most dangerous procedural segment for children’s personalities. The trial is where the justice ‘play’ comes to life on its main stage, with its whole ritual, language, and characters. When attempting to identify safeguards intended to operate during the trial phase, two main fields seem to emerge: one focuses on the issue of assistance, which has to be more profound due to the unique nature of juvenile personality and experience of life; while the other one aims to protect children’s privacy so that their public image will be shielded as much as possible from the negative consequences of the trial. The article first focuses on these aspects by analysing legal regulations and the jurisprudence. In some cases, Italian legal regulation exceeds European directive standards, serving as a model for other legal systems. However, even though the internal regulation formally matches the EU requirement in some instances, it needs further improvement. Also, in terms of the law in action, the Italian jurisprudential approach sometimes weakens the safeguards provided by law, demonstrating the need for different interpretative solutions that are adequate to respect children’s rights fully. In the light of such issues, the author suggests some exegetical solutions.

show abstract

Child Interviewing in Legal Cases : A European Perspective

Cited by 2 publications

References 15 publications

Evolution of the Thoughts of Public Administration and Its Understanding Following the Perspectives of Political Science, Management and Law

Evolution of the Thoughts of Public Administration and Its Understanding Following the Perspectives of Political Science, Management and Law

Protecting juvenile defendants in the trial and from the trial: special safeguards in EU and Italian regulations

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About