Child-display interaction

Rubegni, Elisa; Gentile, Vito; Malizia, Alessio; Sorce, Salvatore; Kargas, Niko

doi:10.1145/3321335.3324942

Cited by 8 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 34 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The training stage was inspired by the experimental design described in [38]. During this stage, the user was firstly asked to interact with the interface.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Touch or touchless?

Gentile

Adjorlu

Serafin

et al. 2019

Proceedings of the 8th ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Interactive public displays have been exploited and studied for engaging interaction in several previous studies. In this context, applications have been focused on supporting learning or entertainment activities, specifically designed for people with special needs. This includes, for example, those with Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD). In this paper, we present a comparison study aimed at understanding the difference in terms of usability, effectiveness, and enjoyment perceived by users with ASD between two interaction modalities usually supported by interactive displays: touch-based and touchless gestural interaction. We present the outcomes of a within-subject setup involving 8 ASD users (age 18-25 y.o., IQ 40-60), based on the use of two similar user interfaces, differing only by the interaction modality. We show that touch interaction provides higher usability level and results in more effective actions, although touchless interaction is more effective in terms of enjoyment and engagement. CCS CONCEPTS • Human-centered computing → User studies; Usability testing; Interaction paradigms; Displays and imagers; Gestural input; Touch screens.

show abstract

“…The training stage was inspired by the experimental design described in [38]. During this stage, the user was firstly asked to interact with the interface.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Therefore, it is worth understanding which interaction modality is more useful in these contexts. Understanding the impact of specific interaction modalities on learning and enjoyment have been subject of study by prior work [38]. However, other factors are crucial too, e.g.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Touch or touchless?

Gentile

Adjorlu

Serafin

et al. 2019

Proceedings of the 8th ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Interactive public displays are seeing increased use in public life in areas like museums [17,20,30], advertising [11,31], interactive art [32], or to deliver instruction content in locations such as airports or public forums [33]. The users can control the content using mid-air gestures, so they do not need to directly touch the screen and can interact from a distance that allows them to see the entire display [20,33,34].…”

Section: Interactive Public Displays and User Representationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Designing Gestures for Data Exploration with Public Displays via Identification Studies

Friedman,

Cafaro

2024

Information

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In-lab elicitation studies inform the design of gestures by having the participants suggest actions to activate the system functions. Conversely, crowd-sourced identification studies follow the opposite path, asking the users to associate the control actions with functions. Identification studies have been used to validate the gestures produced by elicitation studies, but not to design interactive systems. In this paper, we show that identification studies can be combined with in situ observations to design the gestures for data exploration with public displays. To illustrate this method, we developed two versions of a gesture-controlled system for data exploration with 368 users: one designed through an elicitation study, and one designed through in situ observations followed by an identification study. Our results show that the users discovered the majority of the gestures with similar accuracy across the two prototypes. Additionally, the in situ approach enabled the direct recruitment of target users, and the crowd-sourced approach typical of identification studies expedited the design process.

show abstract

“…This can be solved if proper signage is designed on the interface to provide cues to the users. Rubegni et al [32] in their study examined avatar-based touchless gestural interfaces from the standpoint of a child-display interaction. They felt that huge exhibits provide an opportunity to promote the experience and participation of children, such as when they are learning about art, while also posing a variety of problems.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Visual Signifier for Large Multi-Touch Display to Support Interaction in a Virtual Museum Interface

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The signifier is regarded as a crucial part of interface design since it ensures that the user can manage the device appropriately and understand the interaction that is taking place. Useful signifiers keep users’ attention on learning, but poorly designed signifiers can disrupt learning by slowing progress and making it harder to use the interface. The problem is that prior research identified the qualities of signifiers, but their attributes in terms of being visually apparent in broad interaction areas were not well recognized. Implementing the signifier without sufficient visual features such as a picture, figure or gesture may interfere with the user’s ability to navigate the surface, particularly when dealing with domains that demand “leisure exploration,” such as those in culture and heritage, and notably the museum application. As technology has evolved and expanded, adopting a multi-touch tabletop as a medium of viewing should be advantageous in conserving cultural heritage. As technology advances and improves, employing a multi-touch tabletop as a public viewing medium should be advantageous in maintaining cultural heritage. Some visual elements should be incorporated into the signifier to produce a conspicuous presentation and make it easier for users to identify. In this study, a preliminary study, a card sorting survey, and a high-fidelity experiment were used to investigate users’ experience, perspective, and interpretation of the visual signifier of the museum interface for large displays. This work offered a set of integrated visual signifiers on a big multi-touch display that makes a substantial contribution to supporting navigation and interaction on a large display, therefore aiding comprehension of the exhibited information visualization.

show abstract

Child-display interaction

Cited by 8 publications

References 34 publications

Touch or touchless?

Touch or touchless?

Designing Gestures for Data Exploration with Public Displays via Identification Studies

Visual Signifier for Large Multi-Touch Display to Support Interaction in a Virtual Museum Interface

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About