Child and family traumatic stress intervention (CFTSI) reduces parental posttraumatic stress symptoms: A multi-site meta-analysis (MSMA)

Hahn, Hilary; Putnam, Karen; Epstein, Carrie; Marans, Steven; Putnam, Frank W.

doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.03.010

Cited by 20 publications

(18 citation statements)

References 30 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…65, Ghosh Ippen et al, 2011;d = 0.50, Goldbeck et al, 2016), suicide ideation (d = .73; Diamond et al, 2012), depression (d = 0.55), child behavior problems (d = 0.42, Goldbeck et al, 2016), and small effects for parent stress (d = −0.24, Thomas and Zimmer-Gembeck, 2012). The three not involving comparison groups also reported reductions in PTS symptoms (Danielson et al, 2010;Hagan et al, 2017;Hahn et al, 2019).…”

Section: Youth-caregiver Modalitymentioning

confidence: 90%

“…Some also reported caregiver benefits postintervention including caregiver depressive symptoms (Holt et al, 2014), PTSD symptoms (Ghosh Ippen et al, 2011;Hagan et al, 2017), and stress (Thomas & Zimmer-Gembeck, 2012). Of those reporting effect sizes, results demonstrated medium Hahn et al, 2019;Jensen et al, 2014) to large effects (Diamond et al, 2012;Hahn et al, 2019).…”

Section: Youth-caregiver Modalitymentioning

confidence: 96%

“…Regarding TE exposure, some studies required at least one new PTSD symptom following exposure (Berkowitz et al, 2011;Goldbeck et al, 2016) or clinically significant PTS symptoms (Jensen et al, 2014). Other types of TE exposure included child maltreatment (neglect, physical, or sexual abuse; Diamond et al, 2012;Hahn et al, 2019;Holt et al, 2014;Jonkman et al, 2017;Thomas and Zimmer-Gembeck, 2012), witnessing IPV (Cohen et al, 2011;Ghosh Ippen et al, 2011), interpersonal trauma (Hagan et al, 2017), and sexual assault (Danielson et al, 2010). All 12 involved manualized treatment and 9 were RCTs.…”

Section: Youth-caregiver Modalitymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Seven of the 12 studies had a cognitive-behavioral theoretical underpinning (Berkowitz et al, 2011;Cohen et al, 2011;Danielson et al, 2010;Goldbeck et al, 2016;Hahn et al, 2019;Holt et al, 2014;Jensen et al, 2014). Treatment length spanned 4 to 34 sessions (M = 12) and included youth ages 7-18 years old and their caregivers.…”

Section: Youth-caregiver Modalitymentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Systemic interventions for traumatic event exposure: A 2010–2019 decade review

McWey

2021

J Marital Family Therapy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Trauma exposure is a pervasive issue worldwide. People exposed to traumatic events may develop PTSD, depression, anxiety, and other mental health symptoms. Family and intimate partner relationship problems also are frequently associated with trauma exposure. The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic research synthesis of the empirical evidence on systemic interventions for traumatic event exposure from 2010 to 2019. A search of peer-reviewed research resulted in 31 articles that met inclusion criteria and were included in this review. Systemic interventions were grouped by modality (e.g., parent-child, couple, group). The collective evidence was strongest for systemic youth-caregiver interventions, group, and couple treatment categories for traumatic event exposure. Youth-centered interventions that included various combinations of family member participation can be considered probably efficacious. Overall, results indicated that systemic interventions for traumatic event exposure were successful in reducing posttraumatic stress symptoms including PTSD, depression, and anxiety, and improving relational outcomes.

show abstract

Section: Youth-caregiver Modalitymentioning

confidence: 90%

Section: Youth-caregiver Modalitymentioning

confidence: 96%

Section: Youth-caregiver Modalitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Youth-caregiver Modalitymentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Systemic interventions for traumatic event exposure: A 2010–2019 decade review

McWey

2021

J Marital Family Therapy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…As a brief early intervention developed to fill the gap between crisis and long-term trauma interventions, the CFTSI is implemented with children aged 7-18 and their NOCs, in five to eight sessions, during the days and weeks immediately following a potentially traumatic event or the formal disclosure of physical or sexual abuse (Hahn et al, 2016). According to Hahn et al (2019), in addition to contributing to a significant improvement of posttraumatic symptoms in participating caregivers, the CFTSI allows to identify, with a re-evaluation at the end of the sessions, those who might need a longer-term treatment.…”

Section: Number Of Sessionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effectiveness of interventions offered to non-offending caregivers of sexually abused children: A meta-analysis.

St-Amand¹,

Servot²,

Pearson³

et al. 2022

Canadian Psychology / Psychologie canadienne

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Following the sexual abuse of a child, their non-offending caregivers (NOCs) need support in order to manage a double burden: Their own distress and that of the child. Among the scientific literature available, there is no systematic and exhaustive synthesis of existing studies that specifically document the effects of interventions with NOCs. This study aims to examine: (a) the effectiveness of these interventions on the NOCs and (b) the factors that influence this effectiveness. Method: A meta-analysis was performed based on studies including the NOCs of minor sexual abuse victims and reporting at least one NOC outcome. The outcomes reported, as well as study, intervention, and participant characteristics were coded. Eighteen studies documenting the effects of 24 interventions were included. Findings: Overall, the findings reveal a moderate significant effect of the interventions on the NOC. The effect differs significantly according to the outcome measured, ranging from small effect to large effect. The higher the number of NOC needs targeted by the intervention, the larger the effects on the NOC. Of the interventions involving the NOC and the child, those providing joint sessions are three times more effective than those that do not provide any. The moderators associated with study or participant characteristics do not influence the effect of the interventions on the NOC. Conclusion: This study suggests considering the diverse range of NOC-specific intervention needs in order to offer individualized support. More research is needed to understand the extent to which the timing of the intervention following the disclosure influences its effectiveness.

show abstract