1997
DOI: 10.1007/bf02548949
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Child and adolescent group psychotherapy: A narrative review of effectiveness and the case for meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The only single intervention included in the review showed no changes in psychological adjustment. In other fields of clinical child psychology, group and individual treatments could be shown to be equally effective in reducing children's affective symptoms [67,68].…”
Section: Summary Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The only single intervention included in the review showed no changes in psychological adjustment. In other fields of clinical child psychology, group and individual treatments could be shown to be equally effective in reducing children's affective symptoms [67,68].…”
Section: Summary Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differences between treatments were not expected, based on studies that compared individual and group interventions and found, overall, no difference between them (Fuhriman & Burlingame, 1994;Hoag & Burlingame, 1997;McRoberts et al, 1998;Shechtman, 2004).…”
Section: Treatment Of Parents 599mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Since there is a diversity of procedures and techniques associated with a variety of group modalities applied to a range of adolescent issues, recommendations have been made to focus studies on the effectiveness of treatment as applied to specific problems and adolescent samples (Hoag & Burlingame, 1997;Kazdin, 1991;Kendall & Morris, 1991).…”
Section: Adolescent Group Intervention Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%