2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.07.453
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chief Complaint–Based Performance Measures: A New Focus for Acute Care Quality Measurement

Abstract: Performance measures are increasingly important to guide meaningful quality improvement efforts and value-based reimbursement. Populations included in most current hospital performance measures are defined by recorded diagnoses using International Disease Classification (ICD)-9 codes in administrative claims data. While the diagnosis-centric approach allows the assessment of disease-specific quality, it fails to measure one of the primary functions of emergency department (ED) care which involves diagnosing, r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
43
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
43
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…More specific automated quality metric calculation has been reported for SCIP-VTE-2 (deep venous thrombosis) with an accuracy of 96.3% [23] . Measurement concepts have been proposed for automated calculation of American College of Emergency Physicians Quality Metrics basing on availability of variables [24] . EHR-based automated calculation of 12 "meaningful use" quality metrics for more than 100 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More specific automated quality metric calculation has been reported for SCIP-VTE-2 (deep venous thrombosis) with an accuracy of 96.3% [23] . Measurement concepts have been proposed for automated calculation of American College of Emergency Physicians Quality Metrics basing on availability of variables [24] . EHR-based automated calculation of 12 "meaningful use" quality metrics for more than 100 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We now have ED-based fellowships, emerging funding streams, and discussions in the highest levels of EM literature about measurement of quality in the care of our patients. 12 Other specialties are investigating novel approaches to incentivize faculty participation in resident quality improvement projects, such as providing maintenance of certification credit, which could easily be adapted to our specialty. 13 Any future work into designing EM research requirements should be flexible enough to allow for emerging and important areas of investigation such as this.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Imaging metrics should group ED patients with similar complaints together, such as abdominal pain; however, there is no common system for comparing patients with a chief complaint of abdominal pain because no universal categorization system exists for chief complaints, and it is not routinely collected in administrative databases. 11 Most metrics have been developed using diagnosis codes rather than chief complaint as the denominator for quality measures, which limits their utility.…”
Section: Physician Professional Society Efforts To Measure Imaging Qumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When considering new quality measures, it is important to keep in mind clinical relevance, the feasibility of collecting necessary data, and the ultimate reliability and validity of the measure. 11,12 The validity of a performance measure refers to the extent to which it truly measures that which it is intended and designed to measure. Reliability refers to "the stability of a set of observations generated by an indicator under a fixed set of conditions, regardless of who collects the observations or of when or where they are collected," 15 and is a scientific attribute of measurement instruments.…”
Section: Physician Professional Society Efforts To Measure Imaging Qumentioning
confidence: 99%